How Philosophical is Informal Logic?

Informal Logic 20 (2) (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Consider the proposition, "Informal logic is a subdiscipline of philosophy". The best chance of showing this to be true is showing that informal logic is part of logic, which in turn is a part of philosophy. Part 1 is given over to the task of sorting out these connections. If successful, informal logic can indeed be seen as part of philosophy; but there is no question of an exclusive relationship. Part 2 is a critical appraisal of the suggestion that informal logic is applied epistemology. Part 3 examines the claim that informal logic has failed to penetrate into mainstream philosophy, and suggestions for amelioration are considered



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Managing Informal Mathematical Knowledge: Techniques from Informal Logic.Andrew Aberdein - 2006 - Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 4108:208--221.
Making Sense of “Informal Logic”.Ralph H. Johnson - 2006 - Informal Logic 26 (3):231-258.
Epistemology Mathematicized.John Woods - 2013 - Informal Logic 33 (2):292-331.
The Irrelevance of Relevance.David Botting - 2013 - Informal Logic 33 (1):1-21.
Formal Logic for Informal Logicians.David Sherry - 2006 - Informal Logic 26 (2):199-220.
Emotion, Argumentation and Informal Logic.Michael A. Gilbert - 2004 - Informal Logic 24 (3):245-264.
Three Misrepresentations of Logic.Brian MacPherson - 1999 - Informal Logic 19 (2):185–199.
Informal Logic.Leo Groarke - 1996 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
What is reasoning? What is an argument?Douglas N. Walton - 1990 - Journal of Philosophy 87 (8):399-419.


Added to PP

83 (#206,966)

6 months
33 (#105,039)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?