Formal Logic for Informal Logicians

Informal Logic 26 (2):199-220 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Classical logic yields counterintuitive results for numerous propositional argument forms. The usual alternatives (modal logic, relevance logic, etc.) generate counterintuitive results of their own. The counterintuitive results create problems—especially pedagogical problems—for informal logicians who wish to use formal logic to analyze ordinary argumentation. This paper presents a system, PL– (propositional logic minus the funny business), based on the idea that paradigmatic valid argument forms arise from justificatory or explanatory discourse. PL– avoids the pedagogical difficulties without sacrificing insight into argument.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-26

Downloads
135 (#140,560)

6 months
23 (#125,194)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 17 (2):278-279.
The ways of paradox.W. V. Quine - 1966 - New York,: Random.
Beginning Logic.Sarah Stebbins - 1965 - London, England: Hackett Publishing.
Elementary logic.Benson Mates - 1972 - New York,: Oxford University Press.

View all 30 references / Add more references