- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Argument
Lawrence Earlbaum Associates (2000)
Abstract
He further argues that it is necessary to rethink traditional conceptions of argument, and to find a position that avoids the limitations of both the highly abstract approach of formal logic and the highly contextualized approaches of rhetoric and communication theory.".
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Ralph H. Johnson, Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Argument. [REVIEW]Nicole Wyatt - 2001 - Philosophy in Review 21 (3):185-187.
Johnson's Manifest Rationality A Pragmatic Theory of Argument.Trudy Govier - 2000 - Informal Logic 20 (3).
Ralph H. Johnson (2000), Manifest Rationality. A Pragmatic Theory of Argument. [REVIEW]M. A. Van Rees - 2001 - Argumentation 15 (2):231-237.
Ralph H. Johnson (2000), Manifest Rationality. A Pragmatic Theory of Argument.M. A. Van Rees - 2001 - Argumentation 15 (2):231-237.
A Concept Divided: Ralph Johnson's Definition of Argument. [REVIEW]Christopher W. Tindale - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (3):299-309.
Manifest Rationality Reconsidered: Reply to my Fellow Symposiasts. [REVIEW]Ralph H. Johnson - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (3):311-331.
Modeling the Ellsberg paradox by argument strength.Niki Pfeifer & H. Pankka - 2017 - In G. Gunzelmann, A. Howes, T. Tenbrink & E. Davelaar (eds.), Proceedings of the 39th Cognitive Science Society Meeting. pp. 925-930.
Argument, Inference and Dialectic: Collected Papers on Informal Logic.Robert Pinto - 2001 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-06-01
Downloads
28 (#588,700)
6 months
7 (#491,170)
2016-06-01
Downloads
28 (#588,700)
6 months
7 (#491,170)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Handbook of Argumentation Theory.Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans - 2014 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
Philosophy, Adversarial Argumentation, and Embattled Reason.Phyllis Rooney - 2010 - Informal Logic 30 (3):203-234.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-sz9d2 uwo