Informal Logic 26 (3):341-357 (2006)
AbstractIn a posthumous paper, Perelman discusses his decision to bring his theory of argumentation together with rhetoric rather than calling it an informal logic. This is due in part because of the centrality he gives to audience, and in part because of the negative attitude that informal logicians have to rhetoric. In this paper, I explore both of these concerns by way of considering what benefits Perelman’s work can have for informal logic, and what insights the work of informal logicians might bring to the project of Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca
Similar books and articles
The Role of Audience in Argumentation from the Perspective of Informal Logic.Ralph H. Johnson - 2013 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (4):533-549.
Ways of being reasonable: Perelman and the philosophers.Christopher W. Tindale - 2010 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 43 (4):337-361.
Interpreting Perelman’s Universal Audience: Gross vs. Crosswhite. [REVIEW]Charlotte Jørgensen - 2007 - Argumentation 23 (1):11-19.
Con Amore: Henry Johnstone, Jr.'s Philosophy of Argumentation.James Crosswhite - 2001 - Informal Logic 21 (1).
Beyond postmodernism: Logic as rhetoric. [REVIEW]Joseph Margolis - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (1):21-31.
Being unreasonable: Perelman and the problem of fallacies. [REVIEW]James Crosswhite - 1993 - Argumentation 7 (4):385-402.
The conception of audience in Perelman and Isocrates: Locating the ideal in the real. [REVIEW]David Douglas Dunlap - 1993 - Argumentation 7 (4):461-474.
Perelman’s Audience Revisted: Towards the Construction of a New Type of Audience. [REVIEW]Galia Yanoshevsky - 2009 - Argumentation 23 (3):409-419.
Some consequences ofThe New Rhetoric: A critical study. [REVIEW]Thomas M. Carr - 1993 - Argumentation 7 (4):475-479.
The Relation between Formal and Informal Logic.Ralph H. Johnson - 1999 - Argumentation 13 (3):265-274.
Managing Informal Mathematical Knowledge: Techniques from Informal Logic.Andrew Aberdein - 2006 - Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 4108:208--221.
Perelman's Theory of Argumentation and Natural Law.I. I. I. Mootz - 2010 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 43 (4):383.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Rhetorical Argumentation and the Nature of Audience: Toward an Understanding of Audience—Issues in Argumentation.Christopher W. Tindale - 2013 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (4):508-532.
Perelmanian universal audience and the epistemic aspirations of argument.Scott F. Aikin - 2008 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 41 (3):pp. 238-259.
Introduction.Ralph H. Johnson & Christopher W. Tindale - 2013 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (4):379-391.
References found in this work
The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation.Chaïm Perelman & Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca - 1969 - Notre Dame, IN, USA: Notre Dame University Press.