- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Models as signs of the imaginary: Peirce, Pierce, Langer, and the non-discursive sign
Semiotica 2022 (245):63-78 (2022)
Abstract
It is common for us to see models as exemplars of things that exist. Models, instead, are merely Peircean indexes, in that they only point to their objects, objects which may in themselves not exist. This is to say that these examples may only exist as thoughts that point to other thoughts or even ideas that point to objects that may not exist because they are paradoxical.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Representations of imaginary, nonexistent, or nonfigurative objects.Winfried Nöth - 2006 - Cognitio 7 (2):277-291.
Peirce's Basic Classes of Signs in a Somewhat Different Vein.Floyd Merrel - 2000 - The Commens Encyclopedia: The Digital Encyclopedia of Peirce Studies.
Reductionism in Peirce’s sign classifications and its remedy.James Liszka - 2019 - Semiotica 2019 (228):153-172.
10cubes and 3N3: Using interactive diagrams to investigate Charles Peirces classifications of signs.Priscila Farias & João Queiroz - 2004 - Semiotica 2004 (151):41-63.
On Peirce's diagrammatic models for ten classes of signs.Priscila Lena Farias & João Queiroz - 2014 - Semiotica 2014 (202).
Langer’s Logic of Signs and Symbols: Its Sources and Application.Adrienne Dengerink Chaplin - 2019 - Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 3 (4):44-54.
Models as icons: modeling models in the semiotic framework of Peirce’s theory of signs.Björn Kralemann & Claas Lattmann - 2013 - Synthese 190 (16):3397-3420.
Semiotic foundations of the study of pictures.Winfried Nöth - 2003 - Sign Systems Studies 31 (2):377-391.
On the Objects and Interpretants of Signs: Comments on T. L. Short's Peirce's Theory of Signs.Risto Hilpinen - 2007 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4):610 - 618.
The Classifications of Signs : 1903.Anne Freadman - 2001 - The Commens Encyclopedia: The Digital Encyclopedia of Peirce Studies.
From the perspective of the object in semiotics: Deleuze and Peirce.Roger Dawkins - 2020 - Semiotica 2020 (233):1-18.
The Classifications of Signs : 1867-1885.Anne Freadman - 2001 - The Commens Encyclopedia: The Digital Encyclopedia of Peirce Studies.
Analytics
Added to PP
2022-03-19
Downloads
16 (#899,259)
6 months
7 (#418,756)
2022-03-19
Downloads
16 (#899,259)
6 months
7 (#418,756)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Oblique semiotics: the semiotics of the mirror and specular reflections in Lotman and Eco.Remo Gramigna - 2023 - Semiotica 2023 (255):55-75.
La sémiotique en 2022 : le bilan de l’année.Remo Gramigna & Mari-Liis Madisson - 2023 - Semiotica 2023 (255):161-185.
References found in this work
Supersizing the mind: embodiment, action, and cognitive extension.Andy Clark (ed.) - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Distributed Cognition, Toward a New Foundation for Human-Computer Interaction Research.David Kirsh, Jim Hollan & Edwin Hutchins - 2000 - ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 7 (2):174-196.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-659b74868d-vwmnd uwo