Sign Systems Studies 31 (2):392-392 (2003)

Are pictures signs? That pictures are signs is evident in the case of pictures that “represent”, but is not “representation” a synonym of “sign”, and if so, can non-representational paintings be considered signs? Some semioticians have declared that such pictures cannot be signs because they have no referent, and in phenomenology the opinion prevails that they are not signs because they are phenomena sui generis. The present approach follows C. S. Peirce’s semiotics: representational and non-representational pictures and even mental pictures are signs. How and why pictures without a referent can nevertheless be defined as signs is examined on the basis of examples of monochrome paintings and historical maps that show non-existing or imaginary territories. The focus of attention is on their semiotic object and, in the case of non-representational paintings, on their interpretation as genuine icons, not in the sense of signs that represent most accurately, but in the sense of signs that represent nothing but themselves, i.e., self-referential signs
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  Language and Literature  Semiotics
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1406-4243
DOI 10.5840/signsystems200331210
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,316
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Growth of Signs.Winfried Noth - 2014 - Sign Systems Studies 42 (2/3):172-192.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Ecosemiotics and the Semiotics of Nature.Winfried Nöth - 2001 - Sign Systems Studies 29 (1):81-81.
Semiosfäärist. Kokkuvõte.Juri Lotman - 2005 - Sign Systems Studies 33 (1):228-229.
Mereoloogia ja semiootika. Kokkuvõte.Frederik Stjernfelt - 2000 - Sign Systems Studies 28:98-98.
Ökosemiootika ja kübersemiootika. Kokkuvõte.Soren Brier - 2001 - Sign Systems Studies 29 (1):120-120.
Metafoor ja narratiiv. Kokkuvõte.Marina Grishakova - 2001 - Sign Systems Studies 29 (2):517-517.
Intrasemiootika ja kübersemiootika. Kokkuvõte.Søren Brier - 2002 - Sign Systems Studies 30 (1):128-128.
Omailm ja semiosfäär. Kokkuvõte.Mihhail Lotman - 2002 - Sign Systems Studies 30 (1):40-40.
Pragmaatika ja biosemiootika. Kokkuvõte.Alexei A. Sharov - 2002 - Sign Systems Studies 30 (1):258-258.
Vaatleja semiootikast. Kokkuvõte.Marina Grishakova - 2002 - Sign Systems Studies 30 (2):553-553.
Этика умвельта. Резюме.Morten Tønnessen - 2003 - Sign Systems Studies 31 (1):299-299.
Karakterisatsiooni funktsioon olevikus. Kokkuvõte.М Паладян - 2003 - Sign Systems Studies 31 (2):376-376.
Uexkülli 'plaanipärasus'. Kokkuvõte.Jesper Hoffmeyer - 2004 - Sign Systems Studies 32 (1-2):96-97.


Added to PP index

Total views
44 ( #259,200 of 2,519,507 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,153 of 2,519,507 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes