Interests and Choices in Determining Death by Neurological Criteria

American Journal of Bioethics 24 (1):118-121 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Death by neurological criteria (DNC) continues to stir global controversy. Philosophers and theologians contest its moral significance, clinicians and bioscientists debate its probative accuracy, a...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Imposing Death: Religious Witness on Brain Death.Courtney S. Campbell - 2018 - Hastings Center Report 48 (S4):56-59.
Determining Death and the Scope of Medical Obligations.D. Micah Hester - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (6):37-39.
Determining death by neurological criteria: current practice and ethics.Matthew Hanley - 2020 - Philadelphia, PA: National Catholic Bioethics Center.
Commentary on "the incoherence of determining death by neurological criteria".John P. Lizza - 2009 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19 (4):pp. 393-395.
Brain Death and the Law: Hard Cases and Legal Challenges.Thaddeus Pope - 2018 - Hastings Center Report 48 (S4):46-48.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-01-19

Downloads
10 (#1,176,324)

6 months
10 (#256,916)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?