Free Choice and Patient Best Interests

Health Care Analysis 24 (4):374-392 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In medical practice, the doctrine of informed consent is generally understood to have priority over the medical practitioner’s duty of care to her patient. A common consequentialist argument for the prioritisation of informed consent above the duty of care involves the claim that respect for a patient’s free choice is the best way of protecting that patient’s best interests; since the patient has a special expertise over her values and preferences regarding non-medical goods she is ideally placed to make a decision that will protect her interests. In this paper I argue against two consequentialist justifications for a blanket prioritisation of informed consent over the duty of care by considering cases in which patients have imperfect access to their overall best interests. Furthermore, I argue that there are cases where the mere presentation of choice under the doctrine of informed consent is detrimental to patient best interests. I end the paper by considering more nuanced approaches to resolving the conflict between informed consent and the duty of care and consider the option of permitting patients to waive informed consent.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Informed consent and justified hard paternalism.Emma Cecelia Bullock - 2012 - Dissertation, University of Birmingham
Calvin and the Duty to Respect a Patient's Trust.D. T. Ball - 2014 - Christian Bioethics 20 (1):112-122.
Abandoning informed consent: An idea whose time has not yet come.Becky Cox White & Joel Zimbelman - 1998 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (5):477 – 499.
Informed Consent, Autonomy, and the Law.David B. Annis - 1984 - Philosophy Research Archives 10:249-259.
Making Health Care Decisions: A Report on the Ethical and Legal Implications of Informed Consent in the Patient—Practitioner Relationship.United States - 1982 - President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research for Sale by the Supt. Of Docs., U.S. G.P.O.
Consent Obtained by Residents: Informed by the Uninformed?Alan R. Tait - 2019 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 30 (2):163-166.
Informed consent and health: a global analysis.Thierry Vansweevelt & Nicola Glover-Thomas (eds.) - 2020 - Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Other Signing and Patients' Rights.Qun Gong - 2009 - Philosophy and Culture 36 (7):15-30.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-07-18

Downloads
134 (#165,692)

6 months
11 (#358,218)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Principles of biomedical ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1989 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress.
Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics.Onora O'Neill - 2002 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rethinking informed consent in bioethics.Neil C. Manson - 2007 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Onora O'Neill.
The silent world of doctor and patient.Jay Katz - 1984 - Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

View all 37 references / Add more references