Journal of the History of Biology 54 (2):199-228 (2021)

Authors
Davide Serpico
Jagiellonian University
Abstract
In 1976, the Genetics Society of America published a document entitled “Resolution of Genetics, Race, and Intelligence.” This document laid out the Society’s position in the IQ controversy, particularly that on scientific and ethical questions involving the genetics of intellectual differences between human populations. Since the GSA was the largest scientific society of geneticists in the world, many expected the document to be of central importance in settling the controversy. Unfortunately, the Resolution had surprisingly little influence on the discussion. In 1979, William Provine analyzed the possible factors that decreased the impact of the Resolution, among them scientists’ limited understanding of the relationship between science and ethics. Through the analysis of unpublished versions of the Resolution and exchanges between GSA members, I will suggest that the limited impact of the statement likely depended on a shift in the aims of the GSA due to the controversies that surrounded the preparation of the document. Indeed, the demands of the membership made it progressively more impartial in both scientific and political terms, decreasing its potential significance for a wider audience. Notably, the troubled history of the Resolution raises the question of what can make effective or ineffective the communication between scientists and the public—a question with resonance in past and present discussions on topics of social importance.
Keywords IQ controversy  Group differences   Behavioral genetics   Intelligence   Academic freedom   Scientific communication
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10739-021-09637-6
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal.Heather Douglas - 2009 - University of Pittsburgh Press.
Science, Truth, and Democracy.Philip Kitcher - 2001 - Oxford University Press.
The Mismeasure of Man.Stephen Jay Gould - 1981 - W.W. Norton and Company.

View all 27 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Fighting About Frequency.Karen Kovaka - 2021 - Synthese 199 (3-4):7777-7797.
Medical Fact and Ulcer Disease: A Study in Scientific Controversy Resolution.Mark Cherry - 2002 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 24 (2):249 - 273.
Hybrid Vigour? Genes, Genomics, and History.Roberta Bivins - 2008 - Genomics, Society and Policy 4 (1):12-22.
Concern for Families and Individuals in Clinical Genetics.M. Parker - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (2):70-73.
The Dimensions of Scientific Controversy: The Biometric—Mendelian Debate.Robert Cecil Olby - 1989 - British Journal for the History of Science 22 (3):299-320.
Thinking Critically About Race and Genetics.Rose M. Brewer - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (3):513-519.
Race and Iq.Ashley Montagu (ed.) - 2002 - Oxford University Press USA.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-05-22

Total views
43 ( #265,239 of 2,518,488 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #31,395 of 2,518,488 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes