Research governance review of a negligible-risk research project: Too much of a good thing?

Research Ethics 14 (3):1-12 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There are increasing concerns that research regulatory requirements exceed those required to manage risks, particularly for low- and negligible-risk research projects. In particular, inconsistent documentation requirements across research sites can delay the conduct of multi-site projects. For a one-year, negligible-risk project examining biobank operations conducted at three separate Australian institutions, we found that the researcher time required to meet regulatory requirements was eight times greater than that required for the approved research activity. In total, 76 business days were required to obtain the necessary approvals, and site-specific processes required twice as long as primary Human Research Ethics Committee and Research Governance Office processes. We describe the impact of this administrative load on the conduct of a one-year, externally-...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The concept of risk and responsible conduct of research.Eugenijus Gefenas - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):75-83.
The responsible conduct of basic and clinical research.Andrzej Górski - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):3-4.
Regulation and the social licence for medical research.Mary Dixon-Woods & Richard E. Ashcroft - 2008 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11 (4):381-391.
Australian Research Code.Kevin McGovern & Khalafzai - 2008 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 13 (3):4.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-10

Downloads
15 (#944,758)

6 months
4 (#783,478)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?