Compensation and reparations for victims and bystanders of the U.S. Public Health Service research studies in Tuskegee and Guatemala: Who do we owe what?

Bioethics 34 (9):893-898 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Using the infamous research studies in Tuskegee and Guatemala, the article examines the difference between victims and bystanders. The victims can include families, sexual partners, and children not just the participants. There are also the bystanders in the populations who are affected, even vaguely, decades after the initial studies took place. Differing reparations for victims and bystanders through lawsuits and historical acknowledgments has to be part of broader discussions of historical justice, and the weighing of the impact of racism and imperial research endeavors.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moral Bystanders and the Virtue of Forgiveness.Linda Radzik - 2010 - In Christopher R. Allers & Marieke Smit (eds.), Forgiveness in Perspective. Rodopi. pp. 66--69.
Bystanders, risks, and consent.Helen Frowe - 2019 - Bioethics 34 (9):906-911.
So what?" : historical contingency, activism, and reflections on the studies in Tuskegee and Guatemala.Susan M. Reverby - 2018 - In Françoise Baylis & Alice Domurat Dreger (eds.), Bioethics in action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Risky research and bystander consent.Matthew Hanser - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (9):912-917.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-07-01

Downloads
14 (#1,019,789)

6 months
6 (#587,779)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?