Reparations for White supremacy? Charles W. Mills and reparative vs. distributive justice after the structural turn

Journal of Social Philosophy (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Drawing on the work of Charles W. Mills and considering the case of reparations to Black Americans, this article defends the “structural turn” in the philosophical reparations scholarship. In the Black American context, the structural turn highlights the structural and institutional operations of a White supremacist political system and a long chronology of state-sponsored injustice, as opposed to enslavement as a standalone historical episode. Here, the question whether distributive justice is more appropriate than reparative justice is particularly pressing, since structural racial inequalities form part of the basis for reparations. Derrick Darby’s pragmatic argument for non-race-specific redistributive policies and Tommie Shelby’s principled defense of distributive justice are both considered, as well as the challenge to the structural turn that comes from Carlton Waterhouse’s argument for reparations for enslavement rather than “legacy of slavery” reparations.

Similar books and articles

Charles Mills, Materialist Theory, and Racial Justice.John Exdell - 2014 - Radical Philosophy Review 17 (1):83-107.
Backward-looking reparations and structural injustice.Maeve McKeown - 2021 - Contemporary Political Theory 20 (4):771-794.
The structural diversity of historical injustices.Jeppe Von Platz & David A. Reidy - 2006 - Journal of Social Philosophy 37 (3):360–376.
Reparative Justice for Climate Refugees.Rebecca Buxton - 2019 - Philosophy 94 (2):193-219.
Which Way to Justice?Jennifer Harvey - 2011 - Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics 31 (1):57-77.
Beyond the Bank: Justice, Injustice, and Black Reparations.John Torrey - 2022 - Precollege Philosophy and Public Practice 4:51-67.


Added to PP

417 (#45,581)

6 months
417 (#4,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?