Using, risking, and consent: Why risking harm to bystanders is morally different from risking harm to research subjects

Bioethics 34 (9):899-905 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Subjects in studies on humans are used as a means of conducting the research and achieving whatever good would justify putting them at risk. Accordingly, consent must normally be obtained before subjects are exposed to any substantial risks to their welfare. Bystanders are also often put at risk, but they are not used as a means. Accordingly—or so I argue—consent is more often unnecessary before bystanders are exposed to similar substantial risks to their welfare.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,953

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-09

Downloads
21 (#761,167)

6 months
10 (#309,174)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alec Walen
Rutgers University - New Brunswick

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references