Authorship policies of bioethics journals

Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (7):424-428 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Inappropriate authorship is a common problem in biomedical research and may be becoming one in bioethics, due to the increase in multiple authorship. This paper investigates the authorship policies of bioethics journals to determine whether they provide adequate guidance for researchers who submit articles for publication, which can help deter inappropriate authorship. It was found that 63.3% of bioethics journals provide no guidance on authorship; 36.7% provide guidance on which contributions merit authorship, 23.3% provide guidance on which contributions do not merit authorship, 23.3% require authors to take responsibility for their contributions or for the article as a whole, 20% provide guidance on which contributions merit an acknowledgement but not authorship, 6.7% require authors to describe their contributions, and only 3.3% distinguish between authorship in empirical and conceptual research. To provide authors with effective guidance and promote integrity in bioethics research, bioethics journals should adopt authorship policies that address several important topics, such as the qualifications for authorship, describing authorship contributions, taking responsibility for the research and the difference between authorship in empirical and conceptual research

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Policies and perspectives on authorship.Mary Rose & Karla Fischer - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4):361-370.
Criteria for Authorship in Bioethics.David B. Resnik & Zubin Master - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (10):17 - 21.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-09-24

Downloads
47 (#339,475)

6 months
15 (#168,953)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

A proposal for a new system of credit allocation in science.David B. Resnik - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (3):237-243.
[Drug Free Research in Schizophrenia].A. E. Shamoo & Paul S. Appelbaum - forthcoming - IRB: Ethics & Human Research.

View all 6 references / Add more references