Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (4):457-485 (2008)
Abstract |
Given the prominent position Habermas' philosophy has gained, it is surprising that his method, rational reconstruction, has not caused more debate. This article clarifies what this method consists of, and shows how it is used in two of Habermas' research programs. The method is an interesting, but problematic way of confronting some of the basic epistemological questions in the social sciences. It represents an alternative to both the empirical-analytical and the hermeneutic tradition. On the basis of this methodology, Habermas' work is situated between the transcendental and the empirical approach. A fundamental problem is that it remains unclear how to test the hypothesis put forward through rational reconstruction
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1177/0048393108319024 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The Fragmented World of the Social: Essays in Social and Political Philosophy.Axel Honneth - 1995 - State University of New York Press.
The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas.Julius Sensat - 1978 - Studies in Soviet Thought 23 (1):77-79.
The Fragmented World of the Social: Essays in Social and Political Philosophy.Pablo de Greiff, Axel Honneth & Charles W. Wright - 1997 - Philosophical Review 106 (4):605.
Transcendental Arguments and Scepticism.Robert Stern - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (206):119-123.
View all 15 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Supranational Constitutional Politics and the Method of Rational Reconstruction.Markus Patberg - 2014 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 40 (6):501-521.
Making the Improbable Probable: Communication Across Models of Medical Practice.Stephen Buetow - 2014 - Health Care Analysis 22 (2):160-173.
Judgment and Imagination in Habermas' Theory of Law.Thomas Fossen - 2015 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 41 (10):1069-1091.
Justification and Application: The Revival of the Rawls–Habermas Debate.Jørgen Pedersen - 2012 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (3):399-432.
Social Philosophy: A Reconstructive or Deconstructive Discipline?Jørgen Pedersen - 2012 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (6):619-643.
View all 10 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Habermas and Transcendental Arguments: A Reappraisal.Michael Power - 1993 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 23 (1):26-49.
Reconstructing Reason in the Aftermath of Deconstruction.Calvin O. Schrag - 1991 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 5 (2):247-260.
Realism, Method and Truth.Howard Sankey - 2002 - In Michele Marsonet (ed.), The Problem of Realism. Aldershot: Ashgate. pp. 64-81.
Method of Analysis: A Paradigm of Mathematical Reasoning?Jaakko Hintikka - 2012 - History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (1):49 - 67.
Cosmopolitics : Law and Right.Gary Banham - 2007 - In Diane Morgan & Gary Banham (eds.), Cosmopolitics and the Emergence of a Future. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Sociological Not Political: Rawls and the Reconstructive Social Sciences.Terrence Kelly - 2001 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (1):3-19.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
80 ( #143,278 of 2,498,795 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #421,542 of 2,498,795 )
2009-01-28
Total views
80 ( #143,278 of 2,498,795 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #421,542 of 2,498,795 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads