Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (4):457-485 (2008)

Abstract
Given the prominent position Habermas' philosophy has gained, it is surprising that his method, rational reconstruction, has not caused more debate. This article clarifies what this method consists of, and shows how it is used in two of Habermas' research programs. The method is an interesting, but problematic way of confronting some of the basic epistemological questions in the social sciences. It represents an alternative to both the empirical-analytical and the hermeneutic tradition. On the basis of this methodology, Habermas' work is situated between the transcendental and the empirical approach. A fundamental problem is that it remains unclear how to test the hypothesis put forward through rational reconstruction
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1177/0048393108319024
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,078
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas.Julius Sensat - 1978 - Studies in Soviet Thought 23 (1):77-79.
Transcendental Arguments and Scepticism.Robert Stern - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (206):119-123.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Judgment and Imagination in Habermas' Theory of Law.Thomas Fossen - 2015 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 41 (10):1069-1091.
Social Philosophy: A Reconstructive or Deconstructive Discipline?Jørgen Pedersen - 2012 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (6):619-643.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On Habermas’s Critique of Husserl.Matheson Russell - 2011 - Husserl Studies 27 (1):41-62.
Habermas and Transcendental Arguments: A Reappraisal.Michael Power - 1993 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 23 (1):26-49.
Reconstructing Reason in the Aftermath of Deconstruction.Calvin O. Schrag - 1991 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 5 (2):247-260.
Realism, Method and Truth.Howard Sankey - 2002 - In Michele Marsonet (ed.), The Problem of Realism. Aldershot: Ashgate. pp. 64-81.
Method of Analysis: A Paradigm of Mathematical Reasoning?Jaakko Hintikka - 2012 - History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (1):49 - 67.
Cosmopolitics : Law and Right.Gary Banham - 2007 - In Diane Morgan & Gary Banham (eds.), Cosmopolitics and the Emergence of a Future. Palgrave-Macmillan.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
80 ( #143,278 of 2,498,795 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #421,542 of 2,498,795 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes