Habermas and the political sciences: The relationship between theory and practice

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (3):381-407 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Jürgen Habermas’s theories have received enormous attention in the public sphere as well as in political science. It is therefore surprising that his method, rational reconstruction, is not more debated. In political science the method is of particular interest because of its ambition to bridge the gap between empirical and normative approaches. In this article the author traces Habermas’s interest in rational reconstruction by going back to his writings on theory and practice and subsequently shows what the method’s main principles are. He then specifies how this methodological conception is used in Habermas’s political theory. Finally, the introduction of an empirical design allows the author to discuss one of the fundamental tensions in Habermas’s approach: the hypotheses arrived at through rational reconstruction are empirical hypotheses but cannot be tested by empirical means



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,385

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

71 (#227,812)

6 months
9 (#452,266)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Communication and the Evolution of Society.Jürgen Habermas - 1983 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 16 (2):130-136.
The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas.Thomas Mccarthy - 1978 - Human Studies 3 (2):175-184.
The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas.Thomas Mccarthy - 1978 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 49 (3):525-526.
Critical theory.James Bohman - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 12 references / Add more references