Stuart G. Nicholls, Holly Etchegary, Laure Tessier, Charlene Simmonds, Beth K. Potter, Jamie C. Brehaut, Daryl Pullman, Robin Z. Hayeems, Sari Zelenietz, Monica Lamoureux, Jennifer Milburn, Lesley Turner, Pranesh Chakraborty & Brenda J. Wilson
Public Health Ethics 12 (2):158-175 (2019)
Abstract |
Newborn bloodspot screening programs are some of the longest running population screening programs internationally. Debate continues regarding the need for parents to give consent to having their child screened. Little attention has been paid to how meanings of consent-related terminology vary among stakeholders and the implications of this for practice. We undertook semi-structured interviews with parents, healthcare professionals and policy decision makers in two Canadian provinces. Conceptions of consent-related terms revolved around seven factors within two broad domains, decision-making and information attainment. Decision-making comprised: parent decision authority; voluntariness; parent engagement with decision-making; and the process of enacting choice. Information ascertainment comprised: professional responsibilities ; parent responsibilities; and the need for discussion and understanding prior to a decision. Our findings indicate that consent-related terms are variously understood, with substantive implications for practice. We suggest that consent procedures should be explained descriptively, regardless of approach, so there are clear indications of what is expected of parents and healthcare professionals. Support systems are required both to meet the educational needs of parents and families and to support healthcare professionals in delivering information in a manner in keeping with parent needs.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1093/phe/phz003 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The Ethics of Screening in Health Care and Medicine: Serving Society Or Serving the Patient?Niklas Juth & Christian Munthe - 2011 - Springer Verlag.
Disclosure and Consent to Medical Research Participation.Danielle Bromwich & Joseph Millum - 2013 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (4):195-219.
Understanding, Interests and Informed Consent: A Reply to Sreenivasan.Danielle Bromwich - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (4):327-331.
View all 28 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Correlates of Parental Participation During Informed Consent for Randomized Clinical Trials in the Treatment of Childhood Leukemia.Dennis Drotar, Victoria Miller, Victoria Willard, Kyle Anthony & Eric Kodish - 2004 - Ethics and Behavior 14 (1):1 – 15.
Knowledge or Understanding? Informed Choice in the Context of Newborn Bloodspot Screening.S. G. Nicholls - 2010 - Public Health Ethics 3 (2):128-136.
Parental Perspectives on Consent for Participation in Large-Scale, Non-Biological Data Repositories.Kiran Pohar Manhas, Stacey Page, Shawn X. Dodd, Nicole Letourneau, Aleta Ambrose, Xinjie Cui & Suzanne C. Tough - 2016 - Life Sciences, Society and Policy 12 (1):1-13.
A Goodness-of-Fit Approach to Informed Consent for Pediatric Intervention Research.Jessica Masty & Celia Fisher - 2008 - Ethics and Behavior 18 (2-3):139 – 160.
Healthcare Professionals’ and Patients’ Perspectives on Consent to Clinical Genetic Testing: Moving Towards a More Relational Approach.Samuel Gabrielle Natalie, Dheensa Sandi, Farsides Bobbie, Fenwick Angela & Lucassen Anneke - 2017 - BMC Medical Ethics 18 (1):47.
Issues of Consent and the Primary-School Medical.P. Bradley - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (6):469-472.
Parent–Child Roles in Decision Making About Medical Research.Victoria A. Miller, William W. Reynolds & Robert M. Nelson - 2008 - Ethics and Behavior 18 (2-3):161 – 181.
Legal and Ethical Considerations in Allowing Parental Exemptions From Newborn Critical Congenital Heart Disease (CCHD) Screening.Lisa A. Hom, Tomas J. Silber, Kathleen Ennis-Durstine, Mary Anne Hilliard & Gerard R. Martin - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (1):11-17.
Parents’ Attitudes Towards and Perceptions of Involving Minors in Medical Research From the Japanese Perspective.Yasue Fukuda & Koji Fukuda - 2018 - BMC Medical Ethics 19 (1):91.
Bioethical Concepts in Theory and Practice: An Exploratory Study of Prenatal Screening in Iceland. [REVIEW]Helga Gottfreðsdóttir & Vilhjálmur Árnason - 2011 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 14 (1):53-61.
Information and Consent for Newborn Screening: Practices and Attitudes of Service Providers.N. J. Kerruish, D. Webster & N. Dickson - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (9):648-652.
Parental Consent for Newborn Screening in Southern Taiwan.M.-C. Huang - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (11):621-624.
Informed Consent and the Bio-Banking of Material From Children.S.∅ren Holm - 2005 - Genomics, Society and Policy 1 (1):16-26.
Consent Agreements for Cryopreserved Embryos: The Case for Choice.Peter D. Sozou, Sally Sheldon & Geraldine M. Hartshorne - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (4):230-233.
Proceduralisation, Choice and Parental Reflections on Decisions to Accept Newborn Bloodspot Screening.Stuart G. Nicholls - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (5):299-303.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2019-05-05
Total views
20 ( #555,340 of 2,499,677 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,206 of 2,499,677 )
2019-05-05
Total views
20 ( #555,340 of 2,499,677 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,206 of 2,499,677 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads