The Symposium on the Synergy between Implicit and Explicit Learning Processes

Abstract

Implicit processes are thought to be relatively fast, inaccessible, holistic, and imprecise, while explicit processes are slow, accessible and precise (e.g., Reber, 1989, Sun 2002). This dichotomy is closely related to some other well-known dichotomies including symbolic versus subsymbolic processing (Rumelhart et al., 1986), conceptual versus subconceptual processing (Smolensky, 1988), and conscious versus unconscious processing (Jacoby et al., 1994). This dichotomy has been justified by extensive studies of implicit and explicit learning, implicit and explicit memory, and implicit versus explicit metacognition (Reder, 1996).

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Implicit versus explicit: An ACT-R learning perspective.Niels A. Taatgen - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):785-786.
Implicit learning in K. Kirsner et al.A. B. Malone & A. Maybery - 1998 - In K. Kirsner & G. Speelman (eds.), Implicit and Explicit Mental Processes. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
56 (#293,769)

6 months
1 (#1,516,603)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references