A Response to the Open Peer Commentaries on “Young People's Experiences of Participation in Clinical Trials: Reasons for Taking Part”

, , , &
American Journal of Bioethics 16 (2):10-12 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2015.1125968

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Young People's Experiences of Participation in Clinical Trials: Reasons for Taking Part.Malou Luchtenberg, Els Maeckelberghe, Louise Locock, Lesley Powell & A. A. Eduard Verhagen - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (11):3-13.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Assessing the Remedy: The Case for Contracts in Clinical Trials”.Sarah J. L. Edwards - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (4):W1-W3.
Should We Tell Children and Young People About the Positive Experience of Taking Part in Clinical Trials?Merle Spriggs - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (11):35-36.
A Response to the Open Peer Commentaries on “Patient and Citizen Participation in Health: The Need for Improved Ethical Support”.Laura Williamson - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (12):W1 - W5.
Response to Müller.Annemarie Bridy - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (9):W8-W8.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “A Duty to Deceive: Placebos in Clinical Practice”.Bennett Foddy - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (12):1-2.
Supporting positive experiences and sustained participation in clinical trials: looking beyond information provision.Kate Gillies & Vikki A. Entwistle - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (12):751-756.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Neglected Ends: Clinical Ethics Consultation and the Prospects for Closure”.Autumn Fiester - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (1):9-10.
‘Risky’ research and participants' interests: the ethics of phase 2C clinical trials.Sarah Chan, Ying-Kiat Zee, Gordon Jayson & John Harris - 2011 - Clinical Ethics 6 (2):91-96.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Ethics of Clinical Science in a Public Health Emergency: Drug Discovery at the Bedside”.Sarah Jl Edwards - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (9):W1-W3.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “What is The Best Standard for the Standard of Care in Clinical Research?”.Rieke van der Graaf & Johannes J. M. van Delden - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6-7):7-8.
An Unbiased Response to the Open Peer Commentaries on “Does Consent Bias Research?”.Mark A. Rothstein & Abigail B. Shoben - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (4):W1 - W4.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Social Contexts Influence Ethical Considerations of Research”.Robert J. Levine, Judith B. Gordon, Carolyn M. Mazure, Philip E. Rubin, Barry R. Schaller & John L. Young - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (5):W1-W2.
Engaging With a Peer-Proposed, Additional Exploitation Condition: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Transnational Gestational Surrogacy: Does It Have to Be Exploitative?”.Jeffrey Kirby - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (5):W1 - W3.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Disclosing Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants”: Defining Clinical Utility And Revisiting the Role of Relationships.Vardit Ravitsky & Benjamin S. Wilfond - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):W10-W12.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-02

Downloads
14 (#986,446)

6 months
6 (#510,793)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Learning From Research Participants.Emily E. Anderson - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (11):14-16.

View all 9 references / Add more references