Self-awareness and mental perception

Journal of Indian Philosophy 38 (3):233-245 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to clarify Prajñākaragupta’s view of mental perception ( mānasapratyakṣa ), with special emphasis on the relationship between mental perception and self-awareness. Dignāga, in his PS 1.6ab, says: “mental [perception] ( mānasa ) is [of two kinds:] a cognition of an [external] object and awareness of one’s own mental states such as passion.” According to his commentator Jinendrabuddhi, a cognition of an external object and awareness of an internal object such as passion are here equally called ‘mental perception’ in that neither depends on any of the five external sense organs. Dharmakīrti, on the other hand, considers mental perception to be a cognition which arises after sensory perception, and does not call self-awareness ‘mental perception’. According to Prajñākaragupta, mental perception is the cognition which determines an object as ‘this’ ( idam iti jñānam ). Unlike Dharmakīrti, he holds that the mental perception follows not only after the sensory perception of an external object, but also after the awareness of an internal object. The self-awareness which Dignāga calls ‘mental perception’ is for Prajñākaragupta the cognition which determines as ‘this’ an internal object, or an object which consists in a cognition; it is to be differentiated from the cognition which cognizes cognition itself, that is, self-awareness in its original sense

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,596

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-11-17

Downloads
199 (#120,905)

6 months
17 (#154,914)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Whose Consciousness? Reflexivity and the Problem of Self-Knowledge.Christian Coseru - 2020 - In Mark Siderits, Ching Keng & John Spackman (eds.), Buddhist Philosophy of Consciousness: Tradition and Dialogue. Boston: Brill | Rodopi. pp. 121-153.
Can There Be Something it is Like to Be No One?Christian Coseru - 2024 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 31 (5):62-103.
The Concept of Manas in Jaina Philosophy.Jayandra Soni - 2020 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 48 (2):315-328.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Did dignāga accept four types of perception?Eli Franco - 1993 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 21 (3):295-299.
Dignāaga and four types of perception.Zhihua Yao - 2004 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 32 (1):57-79.
On Pramāasamuccayav tti 6AB Again.Eli Franco - 2005 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 33 (5-6):631-633.

Add more references