Ethical Endgames: Broad Consent for Narrow Interests; Open Consent for Closed Minds

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (4):572-583 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The ongoing legal and bioethics debates on consent requirements for collecting, storing, and utilizing human biological material for purposes of basic and applied research—that is, genomic research biobanking—have already managed to pass through three ostensibly dissimilar stages

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In Defense of Broad Consent.Gert Helgesson - 2012 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (1):40-50.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-08-17

Downloads
37 (#445,119)

6 months
92 (#56,373)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?