In Defense of Broad Consent

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (1):40-50 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Proper procedures for informed consent are widely recognized as an ethical requirement for biomedical research involving human beings, in particular as a means to respect the autonomy and personal integrity of potential and actual research participants

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Privacy versus History.Jacob M. Appel - 2012 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (1):51-63.
Dignity, Being and Becoming in Research Ethics.David G. Kirchhoffer - 2019 - In David G. Kirchhoffer & Bernadette Richards (eds.), Beyond Autonomy: Limits and Alternatives to Informed Consent in Research Ethics and Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Privacy versus History.Jacob M. Appel - 2012 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (1):51-63.
Research Involving Human Beings.Florencia Luna & Ruth Macklin - 1998 - In Helga Kuhse & Peter Singer (eds.), A Companion to Bioethics. Malden, Mass., USA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 455–468.
Beneficence in Research Ethics.David G. Kirchhoffer, C. Favor & C. Cordner - 2019 - In David G. Kirchhoffer & Bernadette Richards (eds.), Beyond Autonomy: Limits and Alternatives to Informed Consent in Research Ethics and Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Limits of Autonomy in Biomedical Ethics? Conceptual Clarifications.Theda Rehbock - 2011 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (4):524-532.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-14

Downloads
94 (#187,555)

6 months
39 (#100,146)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?