Biomedical Big Data: New Models of Control Over Access, Use and Governance

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (4):501-513 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Empirical evidence suggests that while people hold the capacity to control their data in high regard, they increasingly experience a loss of control over their data in the online world. The capacity to exert control over the generation and flow of personal information is a fundamental premise to important values such as autonomy, privacy, and trust. In healthcare and clinical research this capacity is generally achieved indirectly, by agreeing to specific conditions of informational exposure. Such conditions can be openly stated in informed consent documents or be implicit in the norms of confidentiality that govern the relationships of patients and healthcare professionals. However, with medicine becoming a data-intense enterprise, informed consent and medical confidentiality, as mechanisms of control, are put under pressure. In this paper we explore emerging models of informational control in data-intense healthcare and clinical research, which can compensate for the limitations of currently available instruments. More specifically, we discuss three approaches that hold promise in increasing individual control: the emergence of data portability rights as means to control data access, new mechanisms of informed consent as tools to control data use, and finally, new participatory governance schemes that allow individuals to control their data through direct involvement in data governance. We conclude by suggesting that, despite the impression that biomedical big data diminish individual control, the synergistic effect of new data management models can in fact improve it.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,764

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Data Science and Designing for Privacy.Michael Falgoust - 2016 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 20 (1):51-68.
Privacy in the clouds.Ann Cavoukian - 2008 - Identity in the Information Society 1 (1):89-108.
A persistent data tracking mechanism for user-centric identity governance.Hidehito Gomi - 2010 - Identity in the Information Society 3 (3):639-656.
Bodies of Data: Genomic Data and Bioscience Data Sharing.Pilar Ossorio - 2011 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 78 (4):907-932.
Bodies of data: genomic data and bioscience data sharing.Pilar N. Ossorio - 2011 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 78 (3):907-932.
Data models and the acquisition and manipulation of data.Todd Harris - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1508-1517.
International Guidelines for Privacy in Genomic Biobanking.Adrian Thorogood & Ma'N. H. Zawati - 2015 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (4):690-702.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-10-05

Downloads
61 (#235,107)

6 months
5 (#243,444)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Rethinking informed consent in bioethics.Neil C. Manson - 2007 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Onora O'Neill.
Why privacy is important.James Rachels - 1975 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 4 (4):323-333.
The right to privacy.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 1975 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 4 (4):295-314.

View all 19 references / Add more references