A Proof-theoretic View of Necessity

Synthese 148 (3):659-673 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We give a reading of binary necessity statements of the form “ϕ is necessary for ψ” in terms of proofs. This reading is based on the idea of interpreting such statements as “Every proof of ψ uses ϕ”.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Variation on a theme of Schutte.D. Probst & G. Jager - 2004 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 50 (3):258.
Provability algebras and proof-theoretic ordinals, I.Lev D. Beklemishev - 2004 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 128 (1-3):103-123.
Proof-theoretic analysis of KPM.Michael Rathjen - 1991 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 30 (5-6):377-403.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
49 (#323,453)

6 months
6 (#510,793)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Reinhard Kahle
University Tübingen

Citations of this work

Direct Proofs of Lindenbaum Conditionals.René Gazzari - 2014 - Logica Universalis 8 (3-4):321-343.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Modal Logic: An Introduction.Brian F. Chellas - 1980 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Uber Sinn und Bedeutung.Gottlob Frege - 1892 - Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Philosophische Kritik 100 (1):25-50.
An introduction to modal logic.G. E. Hughes - 1968 - London,: Methuen. Edited by M. J. Cresswell.
Semantical Analysis of Modal Logic I. Normal Propositional Calculi.Saul A. Kripke - 1963 - Zeitschrift fur mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 9 (5‐6):67-96.

View all 15 references / Add more references