Proof-theoretic semantic values for logical operators

Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (3):466-478 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper proposes a semantic value for the logical constants (connectives and quantifiers) within the framework of proof-theoretic semantics, basic meaning on the introduction rules of a meaning conferring natural deduction proof system. The semantic value is defined based on Fregecontributions” to sentential meanings as determined by the function-argument structure as induced by a type-logical grammar. In doing so, the paper proposes a novel proof-theoretic interpretation of the semantic types, traditionally interpreted in Henkin models. The compositionality of the resulting attribution of semantic values is discussed. Elsewhere, the same method was used for defining proof-theoretic meaning of subsentential phrases in a fragment of natural language. Doing the same for (the simpler and clearer case of) logic sheds more light on the proposal.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
76 (#214,893)

6 months
6 (#510,232)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nissim Francez
Technion, Israel Institute of Technology

Citations of this work

Bilateralism in Proof-Theoretic Semantics.Nissim Francez - 2014 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 43 (2-3):239-259.
Bilateralism in Proof-Theoretic Semantics.Nissim Francez - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic (2-3):1-21.
On harmony and permuting conversions.Nissim Francez - 2017 - Journal of Applied Logic 21:14-23.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Formal features of compositionality.Wilfrid Hodges - 2001 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10 (1):7-28.
Rules for subatomic derivation.Bartosz Więckowski - 2011 - Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (2):219-236.

Add more references