Argumentation 6 (2):251-270 (1992)
Abstract |
Relevance is a triadic relation between an item, an outcome or goal, and a situation. Causal relevance consists in an item's ability to help produce an outcome in a situation. Epistemic relevance, a distinct concept, consists in the ability of a piece of information (or a speech act communicating or requesting a piece of information) to help achieve an epistemic goal in a situation. It has this ability when it can be ineliminably combined with other at least potentially accurate information to achieve the goal. The relevance of a conversational contribution, premiss relevance and conclusion relevance are species of epistemic relevance thus defined. The conception of premiss relevance which results provides a basis for determining when the various ‘arguments ad’ called fallacies of relevance are indeed irrelevant. In particular, an ad verecundiam appeal is irrelevant if the authority cited lacks expertise in a cognitive domain to which the conclusion belongs, the authority does not exercise its expertise in coming to endorse the conclusion, or the conclusion does not belong to a cognitive domain; otherwise the ad verecundiam is relevant
|
Keywords | Argument argumentation arguments ad argumentum ad verecundiam causal relevance conversation epistemic relevance fallacies Locke relevance |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1007/BF00154329 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
An Essay Concerning Human Understanding.John Locke - 1689 - London, England: Oxford University Press.
View all 23 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
View all 17 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
A Formal Analysis of Relevance.James P. Delgrande & Francis Jeffry Pelletier - 1998 - Erkenntnis 49 (2):137-173.
Some Steps Towards a General Theory of Relevance.L. Jonathan Cohen - 1994 - Synthese 101 (2):171 - 185.
Topical Relevance in Argumentation Douglas N. Walton Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1982. Pp. Viii, 81. $18.00. [REVIEW]David Hitchcock - 1986 - Dialogue 25 (4):819-.
Explanatory Relevance Across Disciplinary Boundaries: The Case of Neuroeconomics.Jaakko Kuorikoski & Petri Ylikoski - 2010 - Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (2):219–228.
The Philosopher as Teacher: Articles, Comments, Correspondence. The "Relevance" of Philosophy and its Relevance for Teaching.Michael Fox - 1973 - Metaphilosophy 4 (3):261–268.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-01-04
Total views
25 ( #455,444 of 2,505,615 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,579 of 2,505,615 )
2013-01-04
Total views
25 ( #455,444 of 2,505,615 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,579 of 2,505,615 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads