Results for 'argumentation'

999 found
Order:
See also
  1. Argument's value1.Ontological Arguments & G. O. D. In - 2009 - In William J. Wainwright (ed.), Philosophy of Religion. Routledge. pp. 2--54.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  14
    Was es nicht alles gibt! Neue ideen und argumente zu substanzen und (ihren) eigenschaften. 1 Christian Kanzian universitat innsbruck.Neue Ideen Und Argumente Zu - 2005 - Grazer Philosophische Studien: Internationale Zeitschrift für Analytische Philosophie. Vol. 70 70:215-223.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  14
    Persistent questions in the theory of argument fields.Argument Fields - 1992 - In William L. Benoit, Dale Hample & Pamela J. Benoit (eds.), Readings in Argumentation. Foris Publications. pp. 11--417.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. A Place for Informal Logic Within Pragma-Dialectics.Of Argumentation - 2006 - In F. H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser, Haft-van Rees & A. M. (eds.), Considering Pragma-Dialectics: A Festschrift for Frans H. L. Erlbaum Associates. pp. 63.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  8
    and Patterns of Variation.I. Kim’S. Exclusion Argument - 2013 - In Sophie C. Gibb & Rögnvaldur Ingthorsson (eds.), Mental Causation and Ontology. Oxford University Press. pp. 88.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  31
    Act Utilitarianism and Decision Procedures.A. Revised Impracticability Argument - 1994 - Utilitas 6 (1).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7. Christopher Bennett.Moral Argument & Matt Matravers - 2001 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 4 (3):101.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8. Gem Anscombe.on A. Queer Pattern Of Argument - 1991 - In H. G. Lewis (ed.), Peter Geach: Philosophical Encounters. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 121.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  35
    Justice, Contestability, and Conceptions of the Good.I. Barry'S. Argument - 1996 - Utilitas 8 (3).
  10.  5
    Justice et efficacité linguistique.Deux Arguments - 2005 - In Stéphane Courtois & Jocelyne Couture (eds.), Regards Philosophiques Sur la Mondialisation. Presses de l'Université du Québec. pp. 105.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11. M raw.An Invisible Performative Argument, Geoffrey Leech, Robert T. Harms, Richard E. Palmer, Arnolds Grava, Tadeusz Batog, J. Kurylowicz, Dan I. Slobin, David McNeill & R. A. Close - 1973 - Foundations of Language 9:294.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12. Moral realism and indeterminacy.I. An Epistemological Argument - 2002 - In Ernest Sosa & Enrique Villanueva (eds.), Realism and Relativism. Blackwell.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  7
    Roy A. Sorensen.Omniscience-Immutability Arguments - 1986 - American Philosophical Quarterly 23 (4).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  7
    The rediscovery of light.Arguments Concerning - 1998 - In Josefa Toribio & Andy Clark (eds.), Consciousness and Emotion in Cognitive Science: Conceptual and Empirical Issues. Garland. pp. 3--121.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15. Research and Human Experimentation/Further Reading Barber, Bernard, et al. Research on Human Subjects: Problems of Social Control In Medical Experimentation. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1973. [REVIEW]Moral Argument, Charles Fried, Alice M. Rivlin, P. Michael Timpane & Loren H. Roth - forthcoming - Bioethics: Basic Writings on the Key Ethical Questions That Surround the Major, Modern Biological Possibilities and Problems.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  9
    Two arguments against foundationalism. [REVIEW]Paul Cortios Ritual, Jane Duran, Two Arguments Against Foundatationalism, David Kaspar, Sara Worley & Tjeerd B. Jongeling - 2002 - Philosophia 29 (1-4):241-252.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  17. Emergent Truth and a Blind Spot.an Argument Against Physicalism - 2006 - Facta Philosophica: Internazionale Zeitschrift für Gegenwartsphilosophie: International Journal for Contemporary Philosophy 8:79-101.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18. Fw Householder.on Arguments From Asterisks - 1973 - Foundations of Language 10:365.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19. William P. Alston.Thoughts On Evidential & Arguments From Evil - 2002 - In William Lane Craig (ed.), Philosophy of Religion: A Reader and Guide. Rutgers University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  8
    American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 364.Argument From Desire - 2013 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 87 (2):363 - 364.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  3
    Mediums and Messages.An Argument Against Biotechnical - 2004 - Ethical Perspectives 11:2-3.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22. can be undermined by showing it does not reflect the religion's “truth” or “essence” are likewise vacuous, for there is no “essence” or fixed content to any religion: Scott Atran and Ara Norenzayan,“Religion's Evolutionary Landscape: Counterintuition, Commitment, Compassion, Communion,”.Arguments Outsiders That Militant Islam - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27:713.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23. Bjc Madison.Priori Arguments Against Scepticism Peacocke’Sa - 2011 - Grazer Philosophische Studien, Vol. 83-2011 83:1-8.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  34
    Doing without mentalese.Seven Arguments Against Mentalese - 1995 - Behavior and Philosophy 23:42-47.
    Để xem bóng đá và phát sóng video trực tiếp tốc độ cao, Xoilac là trang web lý tưởng. Đặc biệt, Xoilac không có bất cứ quảng cáo nào, vì vậy người xem vẫn thoải mái thưởng thức trận bóng đá mà không lo bị phân tâm vì bất cứ vấn đề gì. Ngoài ra, Xoilac có đội ngũ dày dặn chuyên môn, luôn đưa ra những nhận định chuẩn xác cho từng trận đấu bóng đá. Với đồ hoạ sinh (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25.  55
    Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and the Sublime.Johann Jacob Kanter, Johann Georg Hamann, The False Subtlety, Four Syllogistic Figures, Natural Theology, Berlin Academy, Moses Mendelssohn, On Evidence, Only Possible Argument, Negative Magnitudes, Pure Reason, The Observations, An Attempt, Winter Semester, Edmund Burke, Philosophical Enquiry & Our Ideas - 1961 - Philosophical Books 2 (2):7-9.
    Contents \t\t\t\t\t \tTRANSLATOR'S INTRODUCTION \t\t1 \t \tNOTE ON THE TRANSLATION \t\t39 \t OBSERVATIONS ON THE FEELING OF THE BEAUTIFUL AND SUBLIME \t\t\t\t\t \tSECTION ONE: \t\t\t\t \t\tOf the Distinct Objects of the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime \t\t45 \tSECTION TWO: \t\t\t\t \t\tOf the Attributes of the Beautiful and Sublime.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   51 citations  
  26. Appelros, Erica (2002) God in the Act of Reference: Debating Religious Realism and Non-realism. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate Publishing Co., $69.95, 212 pp. Barnes, Michael (2002) Theology and the Dialogue of Religions. New York: Cambridge University Press, $25.00, 274 pp. [REVIEW]Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism - 2003 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 53:61-63.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  37
    Should we agree to disagree? Pragmatism and peer disagreement.Susan Dieleman & Steven W. Visual Analogies and Arguments - unknown
    In this paper, I take up the conciliatory-steadfast debate occurring within social epistemology in regards to the phenomenon of peer disagreement. I will argue, because the conciliatory perspective al-lows us to understand argumentation pragmatically—as a method of problem-solving within a community rather than as a method for obtaining the truth—that in most cases, we should not simply agree to disagree.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28. Wer frei ist, ist gebunden.Kants Argument Aus Dem Dritten Abschnitt - 2000 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 3:209.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29. Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning.Douglas N. Walton - 1996 - Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
    This book identifies 25 argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning and matches a set of critical questions to each.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   239 citations  
  30.  6
    Qu'est-ce que la philosophie?Michel Meyer & Perelman Professor of Rhetoric and Argumentation Michel Meyer - 1997 - LGF/Le Livre de Poche.
    La question de ce petit livre est simple : peut-on aller au-delà du constat de crise et d'impuissance dont le philosophe se fait le prophète depuis plus d'un siècle? Peut-on parler de la science sans complexe d'infériorité, de Dieu sans obscurantisme, d'existence sans tomber dans la banalité du café du commerce, de politique sans consacrer le cynisme, de morale sans faire dans le sermon? Bref, la philosophie peut-elle aider à faire comprendre et à dépasser les apories du temps présent qu'elle (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  31. Transcendental arguments and scepticism: answering the question of justification.Robert Stern - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
    Robert Stern investigates how scepticism can be countered by using transcendental arguments concerning the necessary conditions for the possibility of experience, language, or thought. He shows that the most damaging sceptical questions concern neither the certainty of our beliefs nor the reliability of our belief-forming methods, but rather how we can justify our beliefs.
  32. Moorean Arguments Against the Error Theory: A Defense.Eric Sampson - forthcoming - Oxford Studies in Metaethics.
    Moorean arguments are a popular and powerful way to engage highly revisionary philosophical views, such as nihilism about motion, time, truth, consciousness, causation, and various kinds of skepticism (e.g., external world, other minds, inductive, global). They take, as a premise, a highly plausible first-order claim (e.g., cars move, I ate breakfast before lunch, it’s true that some fish have gills) and conclude from it the falsity of the highly revisionary philosophical thesis. Moorean arguments can be used against nihilists in ethics (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  33.  23
    Essentialist Arguments for Discernibility are Unsound.Antoine Taillard - 2024 - Acta Analytica 39 (1):57-77.
    It is common to argue that something x is distinct from something y by pointing out that x and y do not share all their essential properties. I show that arguments of this type are unsound. This unsoundness is rooted in the fact that sentences of the form ‘x is essentially F’ are ambiguous. Under one reading, the sentence says of x that it has a property of a unique and special kind. Interpreted in that way, the sentence is false, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34.  54
    Argumentation Schemes.Douglas Walton, Christopher Reed & Fabrizio Macagno - 2008 - Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Chris Reed & Fabrizio Macagno.
    This book provides a systematic analysis of many common argumentation schemes and a compendium of 96 schemes. The study of these schemes, or forms of argument that capture stereotypical patterns of human reasoning, is at the core of argumentation research. Surveying all aspects of argumentation schemes from the ground up, the book takes the reader from the elementary exposition in the first chapter to the latest state of the art in the research efforts to formalize and classify (...)
  35.  7
    Arguments From Ignorance.Douglas N. Walton - 1995 - Pennsylvania State University Press.
    _Arguments from Ignorance _explores the situations in which the argument from ignorance functions as a respectable form of reasoning and those in which it is indeed fallacious. Douglas Walton draws on everyday conversations on all kinds of practical matters in which the _argumentum ad ignorantiam _is used quite appropriately to infer conclusions. He also discusses the inappropriate use of this kind of argument, referring to various major case studies, including the Salem witchcraft trials, the McCarthy hearings, and the Alger Hiss (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   47 citations  
  36.  21
    Debunking Arguments in Ethics.Hanno Sauer - 2018 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
    In this crisply written book, Hanno Sauer offers the first book-length treatment of debunking arguments in ethics, developing an empirically informed and philosophically sophisticated account of genealogical arguments and their significance for the reliability of moral cognition. He breaks new ground by introducing a series of novel distinctions into the current debate, which allows him to develop a framework for assessing the prospects of debunking or vindicating our moral intuitions. He also challenges the justification of some of our moral judgments (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  37. Slippery slope arguments.Douglas N. Walton - 1992 - New York: Oxford University Press.
    A "slippery slope argument" is a type of argument in which a first step is taken and a series of inextricable consequences follow, ultimately leading to a disastrous outcome. Many textbooks on informal logic and critical thinking treat the slippery slope argument as a fallacy. Walton argues that used correctly in some cases, they can be a reasonable type of argument to shift a burden of proof in a critical discussion, while in other cases they are used incorrectly. Walton identifies (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   53 citations  
  38.  18
    The argument and the action of Plato's Laws.Leo Strauss - 1975 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Plato.
    "-- M. J. Silverthorne,The Humanities Association Review Leo Strauss (1899-1973) was the Robert Maynard Hutchins Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus of ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  39.  7
    Legal Argumentation and Evidence.Douglas N. Walton - 2002 - Pennsylvania State University Press.
    A leading expert in informal logic, Douglas Walton turns his attention in this new book to how reasoning operates in trials and other legal contexts, with special emphasis on the law of evidence. The new model he develops, drawing on methods of argumentation theory that are gaining wide acceptance in computing fields like artificial intelligence, can be used to identify, analyze, and evaluate specific types of legal argument. In contrast with approaches that rely on deductive and inductive logic and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   52 citations  
  40.  7
    Ethical argument for establishing good manufacturing practice for phage therapy in the UK.Mehrunisha Suleman, Jason R. Clark, Susan Bull & Joshua D. Jones - forthcoming - Journal of Medical Ethics.
    Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses an increasing threat to patient care and population health and there is a growing need for novel therapies to tackle AMR. Bacteriophage (phage) therapy is a re-emerging antimicrobial strategy with the potential to transform how bacterial infections are treated in patients and populations. Currently, in the UK, phages can be used as unlicensed medicinal products on a ‘named-patient’ basis. We make an ethical case for why it is crucially important for the UK to invest in Good (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  22
    Contrasting arguments: an edition of the Dissoi logoi.Thomas M. Robinson (ed.) - 1979 - New York: Arno Press.
  42. Argumentation schemes.Douglas Walton, Chris Reed & Fabrizio Macagno - 2008 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Chris Reed & Fabrizio Macagno.
    This book provides a systematic analysis of many common argumentation schemes and a compendium of 96 schemes. The study of these schemes, or forms of argument that capture stereotypical patterns of human reasoning, is at the core of argumentation research. Surveying all aspects of argumentation schemes from the ground up, the book takes the reader from the elementary exposition in the first chapter to the latest state of the art in the research efforts to formalize and classify (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   277 citations  
  43.  17
    Argumentation and the Social Grounds of Knowledge.Charles Arthur Willard - 1982 - University Alabama Press.
    "As a distinctive philosophy, religious humanism emphasizes man's place in an unfathomed universe, reason as an instrument for discovering the truth, free inquiry as a condition for discerning meaning and purpose, and happiness as a fundamental value. "Man's uniqueness emerges partly from homo sapiens' capacity to employ symbols effectively. For this reason, Willard's provocative book is not a celebration of controversy but a sophisticated study exploring the grounds of man's knowledge. Drawing upon phenomenologists such as Alfred Schultz, psychologists such as (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   30 citations  
  44.  23
    Argumentation Mining.Manfred Stede & Jodi Schneider - 2018 - San Rafael, CA, USA: Morgan & Claypool.
    Argumentation mining is an application of natural language processing (NLP) that emerged a few years ago and has recently enjoyed considerable popularity, as demonstrated by a series of international workshops and by a rising number of publications at the major conferences and journals of the field. Its goals are to identify argumentation in text or dialogue; to construct representations of the constellation of claims, supporting and attacking moves (in different levels of detail); and to characterize the patterns of (...)
  45.  36
    Ethical Argumentation.Douglas N. Walton - 2003 - Lexington Books.
    Bridging the gap between applied ethics and ethical theory, Ethical Argumentation draws on recent research in argumentation theory to develop a more realistic model of how ethical justification actually works.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  46. Philosopher-Kings: The Argument of Plato’s Republic.C. D. C. Reeve - 1988 - Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Pub. Co..
  47.  14
    Philosophical arguments: philosophy, objectives, and methodology.Ulrich Verster - 1992 - Oxford, England: Academic Publications.
    Philosophical investigations, reasons, subject-matter https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Ulrich+verster+&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5 https://www.amazon.com/Philosophical-Arguments-Philosophy-Objectives-Methodology/dp/187444000X/ref=a sap_bc?ie=UTF8.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48. Philosophical arguments.Charles Taylor - 1995 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    In this book Taylor brings together some of his best essays, including "Overcoming Epistemology," "The Validity of Transcendental Argument," "Irreducibly Social ...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   164 citations  
  49. An Argument for Skepticism.Peter Unger - 1974 - Philosophic Exchange 5 (1):131-155.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50.  9
    Understanding arguments: an introduction to informal logic.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2015 - Australia: Cengage Learning. Edited by Robert J. Fogelin.
    ADVANGEBOOKS - UNDERSTANDING ARGUMENTS: AN INTRODUCTION TO INFORMAL LOGIC, 9E shows readers how to construct arguments in everyday life, using everyday language. In addition, this easy-to-read textbook also devotes three chapters to the formal aspects of logic including forms of argument, as well as propositional, categorical, and quantificational logic. Plus, this edition helps readers apply informal logic to legal, moral, scientific, religious, and philosophical scenarios, too. Important Notice: Media content referenced within the product description or the product text may not (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
1 — 50 / 999