The measure of all gods: Religious paradigms of the antiquity as anthropological invariants

Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 14:158-171 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Purpose of the article is the reconstruction of ancient Greek and ancient Roman models of religiosity as anthropological invariants that determine the patterns of thinking and being of subsequent eras. Theoretical basis. The author applied the statement of Protagoras that "Man is the measure of all things" to the reconstruction of the religious sphere of culture. I proceed from the fact that each historical community has a set of inherent ideas about the principles of reality, which found unique "universes of meanings". The historical space acquires anthropological properties that determine the specific mythology of the respective societies, as well as their spiritual successors. In particular, the religious models of ancient Greece and ancient Rome had a huge influence on formation of the worldview of the Christian civilization of the West. Originality. Multiplicity of the Olympic mythology contributed to the diversity of the expression forms of the Greek genius, which manifested itself in different fields of cultural activity, not reducible to political, philosophical or religious unity. The poverty of Roman mythology was compensated by a clear awareness of the unity of the community, which for all historical vicissitudes had always remained an unchanging ideal, and which was conceived as a reflection of the unity of the heavens. These two approaches to the divine predetermined the formation of two interacting, but conceptually different anthropological paradigms of Antiquity. Conclusions. Western concepts of divinity are invariants of two basic theological concepts – "Greek" and "Roman". These are ideal types, so these two tendencies can co-exist in one society. The Roman trend continued to be realized by the anti-Roman religion, which took Roman forms and Roman name. Iconoclasm was a Byzantine version of the Reformation, promoted by the Isaurian emperors and failed due to the strong Hellenistic naturalistic lobby. Modern "Romans" are trying to get rid of the last elements of religious naturalism, and modern "Greeks" are trying to preserve the Hellenic elements in Christianity. Patterns can be transformed, but the observational view will still be able to identify their lineage. The developed model allows a deeper understanding of the culture of both ancient societies, as well as the outlook of Western man.

Similar books and articles

The Measure of All Gods: Religious Paradigms of the Antiquity as Anthropological Invariants.Alex V. Halapsis - 2018 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 14:158-171.
Man and logos: Heraclitus’ secret.A. V. Halapsis - 2020 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 17:119-130.
Religious faith: Existential-anthropological meanings.O. I. Predko - 2019 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 16:33-42.
Musonio l'Etrusco. La filosofia come scienza di vita.Luciano Dottarelli (ed.) - 2015 - Grotte di Castro, Italia: Annulli Editori.
An Everlasting Antiquity: Aspects of Peter Brown’s "The World of Late Antiquity".Cody Franchetti - 2014 - Global Journal of HUMAN-SOCIAL SCIENCE: History Archaeology and Anthropology 14 (1):1-7.
The Rise of the "Other" and the Fall of the "Self": from Hegel to Derrida.Asghari Muhammad & Karimi Bayan - 2021 - Quarterly Journal of Philosophical Investigations 15 (36):228-244.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-03

Downloads
398 (#52,810)

6 months
99 (#50,839)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alex V. Halapsis
Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations