Theories of Perception II: After Berkeley

In Aaron Garrett (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Eighteenth Century Philosophy. London: Routledge. pp. 360-80 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A survey of work on perception, mind, and mental representation by 18th century philosophers after Berkeley, notably Robert Smith, William Porterfield, David Hume, Etienne de Condillac, and Thomas Reid.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,435

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Perception and the language of nature.Rebecca Copenhaver - 2013 - In James A. Harris (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Eighteenth Century. Oxford University Press. pp. 107.
Selective History Of Theories Of Visual Perception, 1650-1950.Nicholas Pastore - 1971 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Arnauld, Antoine and Reid, Thomas, defenders of certainty, common perceptives and critics of representative entities.D. Schulthess - 1986 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 40 (158):276-291.
Antoine Arnauld et Thomas Reid, défenseurs des certitudes perceptives, communes et critiques des entités représentatives in Sens commun.Daniel Schulthess - 1986 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 40 (158):276-291.
Thomas Reid’s Theory of Perception. [REVIEW]Catherine Kemp - 2007 - Hume Studies 33 (2):339-344.
Thomas Reid on acquired perception.Rebecca Copenhaver - 2010 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (3):285-312.
Thomas Reid and the Semiotics of Perception.Bernard E. Rollin - 1978 - The Monist 61 (2):257-270.
Condillac's paradox.Lorne Falkenstein - 2005 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (4):403-435.
Distance and Direction in Reid’s Theory of Vision.Giovanni B. Grandi - 2016 - Topoi 35 (2):465-478.
Reidian Dual Component Theory defended.Todd Buras - 2011 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (S1):4-24.
The perception of shape.David H. Sanford - 1983 - In Carl Ginet & Sydney Shoemaker (eds.), Knowledge And Mind: Phil Essays. Oxford University Press.
Berkeley's analysis of perception.George J. Stack - 1970 - New York: P. Lang.
Visible Figure and Reid's Theory of Visual Perception.Ryan Nichols - 2002 - Hume Studies 28 (1):49-82.
Justice And Resentment In Hume, Reid, And Smith.Michael S. Pritchard - 2008 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 6 (1):59-70.
Hume's answer to Kant.Lorne Falkenstein - 1998 - Noûs 32 (3):331-360.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-01-09

Downloads
6 (#1,446,534)

6 months
6 (#509,020)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lorne Falkenstein
University of Western Ontario

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references