Distance and Direction in Reid’s Theory of Vision

Topoi 35 (2):465-478 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Two theses appear to be central to Reid’s view of the visual field. By sight, we do not originally perceive depth or linear distance from the eye. By sight, we originally perceive the position that points on the surface of objects have with regard to the centre of the eye. In different terms, by sight, we originally perceive the compass direction and degree of elevation of points on the surface of objects with reference to the centre of the eye. I consider various problems about distance perception and perception of position with regard to the centre of the eye raised by Reid’s texts. These questions are relevant to Reid’s description of the geometry of visibles as the “intrinsic” geometry of the surface of the sphere

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reid's Direct Realism about Vision.Giovanni B. Grandi - 2006 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 23 (3):225 - 241.
Thomas Reid's discovery of a non-euclidean geometry.Norman Daniels - 1972 - Philosophy of Science 39 (2):219-234.
Thomas Reid’s geometry of visibles and the parallel postulate.Giovanni B. Grandi - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (1):79-103.
Remarks on the geometry of visibles.Gordon Belot - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (213):581–586.
Reid and Wells on Single and Double Vision.Giovanni B. Grandi - 2010 - Journal of Scottish Thought 3:143-163.
Thomas Reid and non-euclidean geometry.Amit Hagar - 2002 - Reid Studies 5 (2):54-64.
Contemporary Arguments for a Geometry of Visual Experience.Phillip John Meadows - 2009 - European Journal of Philosophy 19 (3):408-430.
Reconsidering Reid's geometry of visibles.Gideon Yaffe - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (209):602-620.
The perception of shape.David H. Sanford - 1983 - In Carl Ginet & Sydney Shoemaker (eds.), Knowledge And Mind: Phil Essays. Oxford University Press.
Thomas Reid on Molyneux's question.Robert Hopkins - 2005 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (3):340-364.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-07-31

Downloads
58 (#270,773)

6 months
9 (#290,637)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Giovanni B. Grandi
University of British Columbia

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man.Thomas Reid - 1785 - University Park, Pa.: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Derek R. Brookes & Knud Haakonssen.
An Inquiry Into the Human Mind, on the Principles of Common Sense.Thomas Reid - 1997 - Cambridge University Press. Edited by Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya.
Thomas Reid's theory of perception.Ryan Nichols - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 26 references / Add more references