The Place for Religious Content in Clinical Ethics Consultations: A Reply to Janet Malek

HEC Forum 31 (4):305-323 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Janet Malek (91–102, 2019) argues that a “clinical ethics consultant’s religious worldview has no place in developing ethical recommendations or communicating about them with patients, surrogates, and clinicians.” She offers five types of arguments in support of this thesis: arguments from consensus, clarity, availability, consistency, and autonomy. This essay shows that there are serious problems for each of Malek’s arguments. None of them is sufficient to motivate her thesis. Thus, if it is true that the religious worldview of clinical ethics consultants should play no role whatsoever in their work as consultants, this claim will need to be defended on some other ground.

Similar books and articles

Complex ethics consultations: cases that haunt us.Paul J. Ford & Denise M. Dudzinski (eds.) - 2008 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Why philosophers should offer ethics consultations.David C. Thomasma - 1991 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (2).
The clinical ethicist at the bedside.John Puma & David L. Schiedermayer - 1991 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (2).


Added to PP

198 (#76,533)

6 months
68 (#26,523)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Nicholas Colgrove
Wake Forest University
Kelly Kate Evans
Baylor University

References found in this work

Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?Edmund Gettier - 1963 - Analysis 23 (6):121-123.
The Analysis of Knowledge.Jonathan Ichikawa & Matthias Steup - 2014 - Stanford Encylopedia of Philosophy.

View all 31 references / Add more references