American Journal of Bioethics 20 (12):18-20 (2020)

Authors
Nicholas Colgrove
Wake Forest University
Abstract
McCarthy et al.’s proposal gains much of its plausibility by relying on a superficial treatment of justice, human dignity, sin, and the common good within the Christian tradition. Upon closer inspection of what these terms mean within the context of Christianity, it becomes clear that despite using the same phrases (e.g., a commitment to “protecting vulnerable populations,” the goal of “promoting justice,” etc.) contemporary secular bioethical goals are often deeply at odds with goals of Christian bioethics. So, while the authors are right that there is room for dialogue (and even agreement) concerning general moral principles, the process of specification and application of these principles will often be heavily influenced by competing ethical traditions. Such divergent influences will often frustrate cooperative ventures between secular and religious bioethical projects. Thus, when put into action, McCarthy et al.’s proposal will—at best—produce a divided kingdom; one that cannot hope to stand.
Keywords Christianity  Theology  Justice  Vulnerable populations  common good  bioethics  secular bioethics  sin  christian bioethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/15265161.2020.1832614
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - Oxford University Press.
The Foundations of Bioethics.H. T. Engelhardt - 1986 - Ethics 98 (2):402-405.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Social Context of Religion in the Jurisdictions of Bioethics.John H. Evans - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (12):1-4.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Devil in the Details.José C. Baracat - 2016 - International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 10 (2):209-217.
Civil Disobedience: The Devil is in the Details-Reply.R. Macauley - 2005 - Hastings Center Report 35 (4):5-6.
Civil Disobedience: The Devil is in the Details.E. Haavi Morreim - 2005 - Hastings Center Report 35 (4):4-4.
Designing School Choice: The Devil's in the Details.Rebecca Page Johnson & Kenneth Strike - 2010 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 44 (4):569-577.
Designing School Choice: The Devil's in the Details.Kenneth Strike Rebecca Page Johnson - 2010 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 44 (4):569-577.
The Devil, the Details, and Dr. Dennett.Patricia Kitcher & Philip Kitcher - 1988 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11 (3):517.
The Devil’s Lying Wonders.John Beaudoin - 2007 - Sophia 46 (2):111 - 126.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-11-17

Total views
152 ( #76,780 of 2,504,809 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
36 ( #25,075 of 2,504,809 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes