Abstract
Clinical ethics committees have existed in Norway since 1996. By now all hospital trusts have one. An evaluation of these committees’ work was started in 2004. This paper presents results from an interview study of eight clinicians who evaluated six committees’ deliberations on 10 clinical cases. The study indicates that the clinicians found the clinical ethics consultations useful and worth while doing. However, a systematic approach to case consultations is vital. Procedures and mandate of the committees should be known to clinicians in advance to ensure that they know what to expect. Equally important is bringing all relevant facts, medical as well as psychosocial, into the discussion. A written report from the deliberation is also important for the committees to be taken seriously by the clinicians. This study indicates that the clinicians want to be included in the deliberation, and not only in the preparation or follow-up. Obstacles for referring a case to the committee are the medical culture’s conflict aversion and its anxiety of being judged by outsiders. The committees were described as a court by some of the clinicians. This is a challenge for the committees in their attempt to balance support and critique in their consultation services
Keywords clinical ethics committee  clinical ethics consultation  conflicts  evaluation  procedures
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11019-007-9102-2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,130
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What Triggers Requests for Ethics Consultations?G. DuVal - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (suppl 1):24-29.
Why Doctors Use or Do Not Use Ethics Consultation.J. P. Orlowski - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (9):499-503.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 39 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-01

Total views
25 ( #455,649 of 2,506,442 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,420 of 2,506,442 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes