Limited Aggregation for Resolving Human-Wildlife Conflicts

Ethics, Policy and Environment 1 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Human-wildlife interactions frequently lead to conflicts – about the fair use of natural resources, for example. Various principled accounts have been proposed to resolve such interspecies conflicts. However, the existing frameworks are often inadequate to the complexities of real-life scenarios. In particular, they frequently fail because they do not adequately take account of the qualitative importance of individual interests, their relative importance, and the number of individuals affected. This article presents a limited aggregation account designed to overcome these shortcomings and thus to facilitate decision-making in real-world human-wildlife conflicts.

Similar books and articles

Limited aggregation and zoonotic disease outbreaks.Angela K. Martin & Matthias Eggel - 2022 - Transforming Food Systems: Ethics, Innovation and Responsibility. Eursafe Conference Proceedings.
Human Sentiment and the Future of Wildlife.David E. Cooper - 1993 - Environmental Values 2 (4):335 - 346.
Wildlife rights and human obligations.Julius Kapembwa - 2017 - Dissertation, Reading University


Added to PP

42 (#284,999)

6 months
42 (#38,060)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Angela K. Martin
University of Basel

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan & Mary Midgley - 1986 - The Personalist Forum 2 (1):67-71.
Animal Liberation.Bill Puka & Peter Singer - 1977 - Philosophical Review 86 (4):557.

View all 25 references / Add more references