Nissenbaum and Neurorights: The Jury is Still Out

, &
American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (2):136-138 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In their interesting paper, Susser and Cabrera (2024) apply the contextual integrity framework to brain data and mental privacy. This framework, developed by Nissenbaum (2009) and rooted in digital...

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/21507740.2024.2326967

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Brain Data Availability Presents Unique Privacy Challenges.Joseph Spino - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (2):146-148.
Between Collection and Interpretation: Targeted Rights for Unpredictable Insights.Tessa Gavina & Lucas Gutiérrez-Lafrentz - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (2):142-144.
Integrating Mental Privacy within Data Protection Laws: Addressing the Complexities of Neurotechnology and the Interdependence of Human Rights.Nadine Liv & Dov Greenbaum - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (2):151-153.
Brain Data in Context: Are New Rights the Way to Mental and Brain Privacy?Daniel Susser & Laura Y. Cabrera - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (2):122-133.
Nissenbaum, H., Privacy in Context : Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life.Louis Sagnières - 2013 - Ithaque 12:199-202.
Privacy Concerns in Brain–Computer Interfaces.Jan Christoph Bublitz - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (1):30-32.
Neurorights to Free Will: Remaining in Danger of Impossibility.Koji Ota - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (4):377-379.
In Defense of the Cultural Insensitivity of Neurorights.Shu Ishida & Ryuma Shineha - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (4):385-387.
Privacy in the digital age: comparing and contrasting individual versus social approaches towards privacy.Marcel Becker - 2019 - Ethics and Information Technology 21 (4):307-317.
Minding Rights: Mapping Ethical and Legal Foundations of ‘Neurorights’.Sjors Ligthart, Marcello Ienca, Gerben Meynen, Fruzsina Molnar-Gabor, Roberto Andorno, Christoph Bublitz, Paul Catley, Lisa Claydon, Thomas Douglas, Nita Farahany, Joseph J. Fins, Sara Goering, Pim Haselager, Fabrice Jotterand, Andrea Lavazza, Allan McCay, Abel Wajnerman Paz, Stephen Rainey, Jesper Ryberg & Philipp Kellmeyer - 2023 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 32 (4):461-481.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-04-05

Downloads
37 (#444,844)

6 months
37 (#101,684)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Vera Tesink
VU University Amsterdam
Gerben Meynen
VU University Amsterdam

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Brain Data in Context: Are New Rights the Way to Mental and Brain Privacy?Daniel Susser & Laura Y. Cabrera - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (2):122-133.
Genetic Exceptionalism and Legislative Pragmatism.Mark A. Rothstein - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (s2):59-65.
Genetic Exceptionalism and Legislative Pragmatism.Mark A. Rothstein - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (S2):59-65.

Add more references