Adrian Currie
Cambridge University
Kirsten Walsh
University of Exeter
The past can be a stubborn subject: it is complex, heterogeneous and opaque. To understand it, one must decide which aspects of the past to emphasise and which to minimise. Enter frameworks. Frameworks foreground certain aspects of the historical record while backgrounding others. As such, they are both necessary for, and conducive to, good history as well as good philosophy. We examine the role of frameworks in the history and philosophy of science and argue that they are necessary for both forms of enquiry. We then suggest that the right attitude towards frameworks is pluralism rather than monism: there is no single correct framework to be applied to a given scientific episode. Rather, a multitude of different frameworks are more or less appropriate given various contexts and aims. From this perspective, good frameworks generate and further, rather than frustrate, historical and philosophical enquiry. Our view sheds light on historical disagreement, and on the relationship between philosophy and history of science.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2018
DOI 10.1086/699797
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,114
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

We Have Never Been Modern.Bruno Latour - 1993 - Harvard University Press.
Idealization and the Aims of Science.Angela Potochnik - 2017 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
The Scientific Image.William Demopoulos & Bas C. van Fraassen - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (4):603.
A Confutation of Convergent Realism.Larry Laudan - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (1):19-49.

View all 55 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Simplicity, one-shot hypotheses and paleobiological explanation.Adrian Currie - 2019 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 41 (1):10.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Historical Objectivity and Conceptual Frameworks: A Critical Study of Kant and Hegel.Kenneth Alfred Lambert - 1984 - Dissertation, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick
Historians and Their Duties.Jonathan Gorman - 2004 - History and Theory 43 (4):103-117.
Waves, Philosophers and Historians.Jed Z. Buchwald - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:205 - 211.
Modelling the History of Ideas.Arianna Betti & Hein van den Berg - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (4):812-835.
Hellenistic and Early Modern Philosophy.Jon Miller & Brad Inwood (eds.) - 2003 - Cambridge University Press.
Metaphor and Truth in History.C. Behan McCullagh - 1993 - Clio: A Journal of Literature, History, and the Philosophy of History 23 (1):23-49.
The Object of History.Anders Schinkel - 2006 - Essays in Philosophy 7 (2):13.
British Marxist Historians: An Appraisal.Antony Kalashnikov - 2013 - Constellations (University of Alberta Student Journal) 4 (1).


Added to PP index

Total views
62 ( #182,429 of 2,499,061 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,823 of 2,499,061 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes