Historians and Philosophers of Logic: Are They Compatible? The Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem as a Case Study

History and Philosophy of Logic 20 (3-4):169-180 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper combines personal reminiscences of the philosopher John Corcoran with a discussion of certain conflicts between historians of logic and philosophers of logic. Some mistaken claims about the history of the Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem are analyzed in detail and corrected

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Theory of science.Bernard Bolzano - 1972 - Boston,: D. Reidel Pub. Co.. Edited by Jan Berg.
Weierstrass's final theorem of arithmetic is not final.F. G. Asenjo & J. M. McKean - 1972 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 13 (1):91-94.
Kant and Bolzano on logical form.Paul Rusnock - 2011 - Kant Studien 102 (4):477-491.
Ontologically neutral logic.Theodore Hailperin - 1997 - History and Philosophy of Logic 18 (4):185-200.
The Problematic Reconstruction of the Development of Modern Logic.Risto Vilkko - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 5:31-35.
Proofs of the Compactness Theorem.Alexander Paseau - 2010 - History and Philosophy of Logic 31 (1):73-98.
Bolzano and Kant on the Nature of Logic.Clinton Tolley - 2012 - History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (4):307-327.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
62 (#258,784)

6 months
4 (#776,340)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?