History and Theory 43 (4):103-117 (2004)

Authors
Jonathan L. Gorman
Queen's University, Belfast
Abstract
We need to specify what ethical responsibility historians, as historians, owe, and to whom. We should distinguish between natural duties and obligations, and recognize that historians' ethical responsibility is of the latter kind. We can discover this responsibility by using the concept of “accountability”. Historical knowledge is central. Historians' central ethical responsibility is that they ought to tell the objective truth. This is not a duty shared with everybody, for the right to truth varies with the audience. Being a historian is essentially a matter of searching for historical knowledge as part of an obligation voluntarily undertaken to give truth to those who have a right to it. On a democratic understanding, people need and are entitled to an objective understanding of the historical processes in which they live. Factual knowledge and judgments of value are both required, whatever philosophical view we might have of the possibility of a principled distinction between them. Historians owe historical truth not only to the living but to the dead. Historians should judge when that is called for, but they should not distort historical facts. The rejection of postmodernism's moralism does not free historians from moral duties. Historians and moral philosophers alike are able to make dispassionate moral judgments, but those who feel untrained should be educated in moral understanding. We must ensure the moral and social responsibility of historical knowledge. As philosophers of history, we need a rational reconstruction of moral judgments in history to help with this.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2303.2004.00300.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,214
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Ethical Studies.Francis Herbert Bradley - 1876 - Oxford University Press.
Ethical Studies.Robert D. Mack - 1951 - Journal of Philosophy 48 (16):508-510.
A Berlin for Historians.James Cracraft - 2002 - History and Theory 41 (3):277–300.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Objectivity and the First Law of History Writing.Arthur Alfaix Assis - 2019 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 13 (1):107-128.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Hayden White's Appeal to the Historians.F. R. Ankersmit - 1998 - History and Theory 37 (2):182–193.
Historians and Moral Evaluations.Richard T. Vann - 2004 - History and Theory 43 (4):3–30.
History, Lying, and Moral Responsibility.Andrus Pork - 1990 - History and Theory 29 (3):321-330.
History is Not Historicism.Gene Callahan - 2009 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 21 (4):467-474.
Two Varieties of Historical Writing.Ihor Sevcenko - 1969 - History and Theory 8 (3):332-345.
Historical Theory and Historical Confirmation.Cynthia Hay - 1980 - History and Theory 19 (1):39-57.
Waves, Philosophers and Historians.Jed Z. Buchwald - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:205 - 211.
Let Many Flowers Bloom.Raymond Martin - 2010 - History and Theory 49 (3):426-434.
Moral Judgments in History.Adrian Oldfield - 1981 - History and Theory 20 (3):260-277.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-22

Total views
45 ( #251,596 of 2,507,636 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,530 of 2,507,636 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes