The unexamined student is not worth teaching: preparation, the zone of proximal development, and the Socratic Model of Scaffolded Learning
Educational Philosophy and Theory 49 (14):1367-1380 (2017)
Abstract‘Scaffolded learning’ describes a cluster of instructional techniques designed to move students from a novice position toward greater understanding, such that they become independent learners. Our Socratic Model of Scaffolded Learning includes two phases not normally included in discussions of scaffolded learning, the preparatory and problematizing phases. Our article will illuminate this blind spot by arguing that these crucial preliminary elements ought to be considered an integral part of a scaffolding model. If instructors are cognizant of the starting position of students, then students are more likely to develop a proper sense of autonomy. We turn, then, to examples from Socrates, the archetypal teacher, that cast light on the importance of preparation and problematizing for the student. Finally, we address the concern that integrating these preliminary elements into scaffolded learning would unnecessarily complicate a useful and effective pedagogical method. Ultimately, if it is effective and autonomous learners we wish to cultivate in the classroom, then something like SMSL must include preliminary elements that calibrate the instructor’s approach to the members of the class. After all, the unexamined student is not worth teaching.
Similar books and articles
Freeing Meno's Slave Boy: Scaffolded Learning in the Philosophy Classroom.Robert Colter & Joseph Ulatowski - 2015 - Teaching Philosophy 38 (1):25-49.
Social Dexterity in Inquity and Argumentation: An Apologia of Socrates.Robert Colter & Joseph Ulatowski - 2016 - American Association of Philosophy Teachers Studies in Pedagogy 2:6-27.
Breaking the Language Barrier: Using Translations for Teaching Introductory Philosophy.Carmen Adel & Joseph Ulatowski - 2017 - American Association of Philosophy Teachers Studies in Pedagogy 3:33-52.
The Socratic Teaching Method: A Therapeutic Approach to Learning.Mehul Shah - 2008 - Teaching Philosophy 31 (3):267-275.
The Construction of Causal Schemes: Learning Mechanisms at the Knowledge Level.Andrea A. diSessa - 2014 - Cognitive Science 38 (5):795-850.
The affective establishment and maintenance of vygotsky’s zone of proximal development.Michael G. Levykh - 2008 - Educational Theory 58 (1):83-101.
Scaffolded Writing as a Tool for Critical Thinking: Teaching Beginning Students How to Write Arguments.Cynthia D. Coe - 2011 - Teaching Philosophy 34 (1):33-50.
Student-Centered Discussions in Introductory Philosophy: A Case Study on the Nature of Art.Michael Gettings - 2013 - Teaching Philosophy 36 (4):321-336.
Teaching philosophy outside of the classroom: One alternative to service learning.Sarah K. Donovan - 2008 - Teaching Philosophy 31 (2):161-177.
Doing philosophy effectively: student learning in classroom teaching.N. H. H. Kienstra, J. E. Imants, M. Kraskens & P. van der Heijden - unknown
Teaching Philosophy Outside of the Classroom: One Alternative to Service Learning.Sarah K. Donovan - 2008 - Teaching Philosophy 31 (2):161-177.
Misconceptions and realities about teaching online.Joan E. Sieber - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (3):329-340.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Philosophical Investigations.Ludwig Josef Johann Wittgenstein - 1953 - New York, NY, USA: Wiley-Blackwell.
The Possibility of Inquiry: Meno’s Paradox from Socrates to Sextus.Gail Fine - 2014 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.