Synthese 198 (Suppl 20):4947-4968 (2019)

Authors
Colin R. Caret
Utrecht University
Abstract
This paper scrutinizes the debate over logical pluralism. I hope to make this debate more tractable by addressing the question of motivating data: what would count as strong evidence in favor of logical pluralism? Any research program should be able to answer this question, but when faced with this task, many logical pluralists fall back on brute intuitions. This sets logical pluralism on a weak foundation and makes it seem as if nothing pressing is at stake in the debate. The present paper aims to improve this situation by looking at a promising case study and drawing general lessons about the kind of evidence that would support logical pluralism. I argue that the best motivation for logical pluralism will ultimately be rooted in certain kinds of performative data.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-019-02132-w
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,436
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Modal Logic as Metaphysics.Timothy Williamson - 2013 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Truth and Objectivity.Crispin Wright - 1992 - Harvard University Press.
Logical Pluralism.Jc Beall & Greg Restall - 2005 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Truth as One and Many.Michael P. Lynch - 2009 - Clarendon Press.

View all 60 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Logical Pluralism and Interpretations of Logical Systems.Diego Tajer & Camillo Fiore - forthcoming - Logic and Logical Philosophy:1-26.
Against telic monism in logic.Leon Commandeur - 2022 - Synthese 200 (1):1-18.
Logical Relativism Through Logical Contexts.Jonas R. Becker Arenhart - 2021 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 17 (2):(A2)5-28.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Logical Pluralism and Semantic Information.Patrick Allo - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (6):659 - 694.
Carnap’s Tolerance, Meaning, and Logical Pluralism.Greg Restall - 2002 - Journal of Philosophy 99 (8):426 - 443.
Limiting Logical Pluralism.Suki Finn - 2019 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 20):4905-4923.
What Logical Pluralism Cannot Be.Rosanna Keefe - 2014 - Synthese 191 (7):1375-1390.
Logical Pluralism From a Pragmatic Perspective.Teresa Kouri Kissel - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (3):578-591.
Logical Pluralism, Meaning-Variance, and Verbal Disputes.Ole Thomassen Hjortland - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (2):355-373.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-02-20

Total views
82 ( #143,258 of 2,519,857 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #50,478 of 2,519,857 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes