The Slippery Slope of Prenatal Testing for Social Traits

, , , , , , , &
American Journal of Bioethics 23 (3):36-38 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Bowman-Smart et al. (2023) argue for a framework to examine the ethical issues associated with genetic screening for non-medical traits in the context of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT). Such s...

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2023.2169395

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Many Guises of the Slippery Slope Argument.Jeffrey P. Whitman - 1994 - Social Theory and Practice 20 (1):85-97.
Slippery Slope Arguments and Social Policy Debates.Eric Lode - 1996 - Dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder
A Logical Analysis of Slippery Slope Arguments.Georg Spielthenner - 2010 - Health Care Analysis 18 (2):148-163.
Prospects for limiting access to prenatal genetic information about Down syndrome in light of the expansion of prenatal genomics.Chris Kaposy - 2022 - The New Bioethics 29 (3):226-246.
Pulling up the runaway: the effect of new evidence on euthanasia's slippery slope.C. J. Ryan - 1998 - Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (5):341-344.
Evaluating the Meta-Slope: Is there a Slippery Slope Argument against Slippery Slope Arguments? [REVIEW]Adam Corner & Ulrike Hahn - 2007 - Argumentation 21 (4):349-359.
The great slippery-slope argument.J. A. Burgess - 1993 - Journal of Medical Ethics 19 (3):169-174.
The Hidden Logic of Slippery Slope Arguments.Dale Jacquette - 1989 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 22 (1):59 - 70.
The psychological slippery slope from physician-assisted death to active euthanasia: a paragon of fallacious reasoning.Jordan Potter - 2019 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 22 (2):239-244.
The Basic Slippery Slope Argument.Douglas Walton - 2015 - Informal Logic 35 (3):273-311.
Book review: Erik Parens and Adrienne Asch. Prenatal testing: A review of prenatal testing and disability rights, Washington, D.c.: Georgetown university press, 2000; and rayna Rapp. Testing women, testing the fetus: The social impact of amniocentesis in America. [REVIEW]Mary Briody Mahowald - 2004 - Hypatia 19 (3):216-221.
Consequentialism and the slippery slope: A response to Clark.Jonathan Hughes - 2000 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (2):213–220.
What's Wrong with Slippery Slope Arguments?Trudy Govier - 1982 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12 (2):303 - 316.
Eugenics or Not, Prenatal Genetic Testing’s Common Issues Need to Be Addressed.Mark W. Leach - 2021 - In Megan A. Allyse & Marsha Michie (eds.), Born Well: Prenatal Genetics and the Future of Having Children. Springer Verlag. pp. 33-44.
Slippery Slope Arguments as Precautionary Arguments: A New Way of Understanding the Concern about Geoengineering Research.James Andow - 2023 - Environmental Values 32 (6):701-717.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-03-17

Downloads
19 (#799,523)

6 months
10 (#268,496)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references