Social Theory and Practice 20 (1):85-97 (1994)

This paper examines how slippery slope arguments are used, and misused, in many public policy debates -- especially in the area of bioethics. I divide the various kinds of slippery slope arguments into the following categories: 1) the logical form vs the conceptual form, and 2) the theoretical context vs the practical context. While all these various types of slippery slope arguments are found wanting, I nonetheless find a valuable role for slippery slope arguments in public debate. In that they give expression to certain of our moral emotions, slippery slope arguments should not be dismissed out of hand by philosophers
Keywords Applied Philosophy  Social and Political Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0037-802X
DOI 10.5840/soctheorpract19942012
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,290
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Consequentialism and the Slippery Slope: A Response to Clark.Jonathan Hughes - 2000 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (2):213–220.
Slippery Slope Arguments.Douglas N. Walton - 1992 - Oxford University Press.
Debunking the Slippery Slope Argument Against Human Germ-Line Gene Therapy.David Resnik - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (1):23-40.
Arguing Along the Slippery Slope of Human Embryo Research.Jeanne Salmon Freeman - 1996 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (1):61-81.
Human Gene Therapy and the Slippery Slope Argument.Veikko Launis - 2002 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (2):169-179.
The Standing is Slippery.Michael J. Wreen - 2004 - Philosophy 79 (4):553-572.
The Great Slippery-Slope Argument.J. A. Burgess - 1993 - Journal of Medical Ethics 19 (3):169-174.
The Slippery Slope Argument.Wibren van Der Burg - 1991 - Ethics 102 (1):42 - 65.
The Fallacy of the Slippery Slope Argument on Abortion.Chenyang Li - 1992 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 9 (2):233-237.


Added to PP index

Total views
19 ( #585,007 of 2,519,270 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,861 of 2,519,270 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes