Book review: Erik Parens and Adrienne Asch. Prenatal testing: A review of prenatal testing and disability rights, Washington, D.c.: Georgetown university press, 2000; and rayna Rapp. Testing women, testing the fetus: The social impact of amniocentesis in America [Book Review]
Hypatia 19 (3):216-221 (2004)
AbstractThis article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Similar books and articles
Prenatal Testing, Reproductive Autonomy, and Disability Interests.Rosamund Scott - 2005 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14 (1):65-82.
Review of Prenatal Testing & Disability Rights, Edited by Adrienne Asch and Erik Parens. [REVIEW]Steven Edwards - 2002 - Nursing Philosophy 3 (1):73–74.
Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights.Laura Purdy - 2001 - Social Theory and Practice 27 (4):681-687.
Testing as a Selection Tool: Another Old and Sticky Managerial Human Rights Issue. [REVIEW]George Munchus - 1989 - Journal of Business Ethics 8 (10):817 - 820.
Prenatal Diagnosis, Personal Identity, and Disability.James Lindemann Nelson - 2000 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10 (3):213-228.
Prenatal Testing and Disability: A Truce in the Culture Wars?Rebecca Dresser - 2009 - Hastings Center Report 39 (3):7-8.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.Donna Harawy - 1988 - Feminist Studies 14 (3):575-599.
Choosing Who Will Be Disabled: Genetic Intervention and the Morality of Inclusion.Allen Buchanan - 1996 - Social Philosophy and Policy 13 (2):18.
Choosing Who Will Be Disabled: Genetic Intervention and the Morality of Inclusion: Allen Buchanan.Allen Buchanan - 1996 - Social Philosophy and Policy 13 (2):18-46.