- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The promise and peril of CRISPR
Neal Baer (ed.)
Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press (2024)
Abstract
Comprising eight revised essays and seven new pieces, this work provides a comprehensive resource for students, scientists, bioethicists, physicians, and laypeople to better understand and discuss the ethical issues underlying this technology that has the potential to forever change the world.
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Chapters
Similar books and articles
The genome editing revolution: A CRISPR‐Cas TALE off‐target story.Stefano Stella & Guillermo Montoya - 2016 - Bioessays 38 (S1):4-13.
Beyond Mendelian Genetics: Anticipatory Biomedical Ethics and Policy Implications for the Use of CRISPR Together with Gene Drive in Humans.Michael W. Nestor & Richard L. Wilson - 2020 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17 (1):133-144.
The CRISPR Revolution in Genome Engineering: Perspectives from Religious Ethics.Jung Lee - 2022 - Journal of Religious Ethics 50 (3):333-360.
Managing New Technology When Effective Control is Lost: Facing Hard Choices With CRISPR.Joel Andrew Zimbelman - 2022 - Journal of Religious Ethics 50 (3):433-460.
The promise and peril of CRISPR gene drives.Gabriel E. Zentner & Michael J. Wade - 2017 - Bioessays 39 (10):1700109.
Should Parents Design Their Children’s Genome: Some General Arguments and a Confucian Solution.Jianhui Li & Xin Zhang - 2019 - Philosophies 4 (3):43.
CRISPR-Cas9 and He Jiankui's Case: an Islamic Bioethics Review using Maqasid al-Shari'a and Qawaid Fighiyyah.Nimah Alsomali & Ghaiath Hussein - 2021 - Asian Bioethics Review 13 (2):149-165.
Genome Editing for Longer Lives: The Problem of Loneliness.C. S. Wareham - 2020 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17 (2):309-314.
The Ethics of Genetic Cognitive Enhancement: Gene Editing or Embryo Selection?Marcelo de Araujo - 2020 - Philosophies 5 (3):20.
A critical review of the ethical and legal issues in human germline gene editing: Considering human rights and a call for an African perspective.B. Shozi - 2020 - South African Journal of Bioethics and Law 13 (1):62.
Prime editing in plants and mammalian cells: Mechanism, achievements, limitations, and future prospects.V. Edwin Hillary & S. Antony Ceasar - 2022 - Bioessays 44 (9):2200032.
Ethics and Genomic Editing Using the Crispr-Cas9 Technique: Challenges and Conflicts.David Lorenzo, Montse Esquerda, Francesc Palau, Francisco J. Cambra & Grup Investigació en Bioética - 2022 - NanoEthics 16 (3):313-321.
CRISPR/Cas technology as a promising weapon to combat viral infections.Carmen Escalona-Noguero, María López-Valls & Begoña Sot - 2021 - Bioessays 43 (4):2000315.
Analytics
Added to PP
2024-03-30
Downloads
12 (#1,085,484)
6 months
12 (#213,833)
2024-03-30
Downloads
12 (#1,085,484)
6 months
12 (#213,833)
Historical graph of downloads
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-zf4z4 uwo