Ethics and Genomic Editing Using the Crispr-Cas9 Technique: Challenges and Conflicts

NanoEthics 16 (3):313-321 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The field of genetics has seen major advances in recent decades, particularly in research, prevention and diagnosis. One of the most recent developments, the genomic editing technique Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas9, has opened the possibility for genetic therapies through genome modification. The technique marks an improvement on previous procedures but poses some serious ethical conflicts. Bioethics is the discipline geared at finding answers to ethical challenges posed by progress in medicine and biology and examining their repercussions for society. It can also offer a conceptualization of these ethical dilemmas. The aim of this paper is to offer a map of the ethical dilemmas associated with this technique by way of a critical analysis of current literature. The main issues can be grouped in four areas: efficacy and security; the types of cells which can be targeted by the technique (somatic, embryonic and gametes); the goal of the therapy; and accessibility and justice.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

La técnica CRISPR-Cas9 unos años después.Gilberto A. Gamboa-Bernal - 2022 - Persona y Bioética 25 (2):2521-2521.
“Editing”: A Productive Metaphor for Regulating CRISPR.Ben Merriman - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12):62-64.
Cutting Eugenics Out of CRISPR-Cas9.Carolyn Brokowski, Marya Pollack & Robert Pollack - 2015 - Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine 6 (3-4):263-279.
Safety and Security Risks of CRISPR/Cas9.Johannes Rath - 2018 - In Doris Schroeder, Julie Cook, François Hirsch, Solveig Fenet & Vasantha Muthuswamy (eds.), Ethics Dumping: Case Studies From North-South Research Collaborations. Springer. pp. 107-113.
Genome Editing and the Law.Stephan Rixen - 2018 - In Matthias Braun, Hannah Schickl & Peter Dabrock (eds.), Between Moral Hazard and Legal Uncertainty: Ethical, Legal and Societal Challenges of Human Genome Editing. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. pp. 17-30.
CRISPR Becomes Clearer.Andrew W. Torrance - 2017 - Hastings Center Report 47 (5):5-6.
Trust in Science: CRISPR–Cas9 and the Ban on Human Germline Editing.Stephan Guttinger - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (4):1077-1096.
The Mechanism and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9.Paul Scherz - 2017 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 17 (1):29-36.
Genome Editing with CRISPR.Nicanor Pier Giorgio Austriaco - 2016 - Ethics and Medics 41 (3):1-3.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-01

Downloads
21 (#718,251)

6 months
16 (#148,627)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?