Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. On the Significance of the Identity Debate in DBS and the Need of an Inclusive Research Agenda. A Reply to Gilbert, Viana and Ineichen.Anke Snoek, Sanneke de Haan, Maartje Schermer & Dorothee Horstkötter - 2019 - Neuroethics 14 (1):65-74.
    Gilbert et al. argue that the concerns about the influence of Deep Brain Stimulation on – as they lump together – personality, identity, agency, autonomy, authenticity and the self are due to an ethics hype. They argue that there is only a small empirical base for an extended ethics debate. We will critically examine their claims and argue that Gilbert and colleagues do not show that the identity debate in DBS is a bubble, they in fact give very little evidence (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Toward a More-Than-Human Approach to Neurotechnologies.Deborah Lupton - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (4):174-176.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Trading Vulnerabilities: Living with Parkinson’s Disease before and after Deep Brain Stimulation.Sara Goering, Anna Wexler & Eran Klein - 2021 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 30 (4):623-630.
    Implanted medical devices—for example, cardiac defibrillators, deep brain stimulators, and insulin pumps—offer users the possibility of regaining some control over an increasingly unruly body, the opportunity to become part “cyborg” in service of addressing pressing health needs. We recognize the value and effectiveness of such devices, but call attention to what may be less clear to potential users—that their vulnerabilities may not entirely disappear but instead shift. We explore the kinds of shifting vulnerabilities experienced by people with Parkinson’s disease (PD) (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation