Neuroethics 14 (1):65-74 (2021)

Authors
Sanneke De Haan
Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin
Abstract
Gilbert et al. argue that the concerns about the influence of Deep Brain Stimulation on – as they lump together – personality, identity, agency, autonomy, authenticity and the self are due to an ethics hype. They argue that there is only a small empirical base for an extended ethics debate. We will critically examine their claims and argue that Gilbert and colleagues do not show that the identity debate in DBS is a bubble, they in fact give very little evidence for that. Rather they show the challenges of doing research in a field that is stretched out over multiple disciplines. In that sense their paper is an important starting point for a discussion on methodology and offers valuable lessons for a future research agenda.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s12152-019-09411-w
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,192
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Inclusive Education? This Must Signify 'New Times' in Educational Research.Roger Slee - 1998 - British Journal of Educational Studies 46 (4):440 - 454.
Identity Politics Reconsidered.Linda Alcoff (ed.) - 2006 - Palgrave-Macmillan.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-05-26

Total views
15 ( #697,896 of 2,507,351 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,155 of 2,507,351 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes