Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. On the Relative Intrusiveness of Physical and Chemical Restraints.Gabriel De Marco, Thomas Douglas, Lisa Forsberg & Julian Savulescu - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (1):26-28.
    Crutchfield and Redinger argue that consciousness-altering chemical restraints are less “liberty-intrusive” (or as we will sometimes put it, just less “intrusive”) than physical restraints. Physica...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Basic Liberties, Consent, and Chemical Restraints.Parker Crutchfield & Michael Redinger - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (2).
    We thank all the thoughtful authors for their insightful comments. In this response, we try to address some of themes that emerged from the commentaries. We leave aside some of those comments that...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Chemical Restraints for Obstetric Violence: Anesthesiology Professionals, Moral Courage, and the Prevention of Forced and Coerced Surgeries.Alyssa Burgart & Caitlin Sutton - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (2):4-7.
    Once anesthetized, patients are inherently “compliant” with surgical interventions because they can no longer intervene on their own behalf. In their target article, Minkoff et al. (2024) reasonabl...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Chemical Restraints and the Basic Liberties.David Birks - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (1):22-24.
    Crutchfield and Redinger (2024) argue that, ceteris paribus, it is morally worse to deploy a restraint that undermines a basic liberty than one that does not.1 This is a plausible view, and is like...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • On Being Conscious as a Basic Liberty.Peter Shiu-Hwa Tsu & Shunsuke Sugimoto - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (1):24-26.
    Crutchfield and Redinger (2024) maintain that “being conscious is a basic liberty,” and infer from this that without informed consent, deep sedation, by intruding upon one’s consciousness, is an in...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Limitations of Principlism.Jed P. Mangal & Nathan S. Scheiner - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (1):17-19.
    In their article, Crutchfield and Redinger (2024) outline the conditions that they have identified as situations in which it is ethically permissible to use chemical restraints, defined as medicati...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Preferences of Individual Mental Health Service Users Are Essential in Determining the Least Restrictive Type of Restraint.Christin Hempeler, Esther Braun, Mirjam Faissner, Jakov Gather & Matthé Scholten - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (1):19-22.
    Crutchfield and Redinger (2024) propose that the use of a chemical restraint that affects only a particular conscious state is ethically permissible if, and only if, (1) it is the least restrictive...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • On Changes and Opportunities at AJOB Neuroscience.Veljko Dubljevic - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (1):1-2.
    As the new Editor-in-Chief (EiC) of the AJOB Neuroscience, I am aware that I have some very large shoes to fill. Paul Root Wolpe, who established the quality of the journal and served in that posit...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Lived Realities of Chemical Restraint: Prioritizing Patient Experience.Ryan Dougherty, Joanna Smolenski & Jared N. Smith - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (1):29-31.
    In The Conditions for Ethical Chemical Restraint, Crutchfield and Redinger (2024) propose ethical standards for the use of chemical restraints, which they consider normatively distinct from physica...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation