Chemical Restraints and the Basic Liberties

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (1):22-24 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Crutchfield and Redinger (2024) argue that, ceteris paribus, it is morally worse to deploy a restraint that undermines a basic liberty than one that does not.1 This is a plausible view, and is like...

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/21507740.2023.2292498

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Lived Realities of Chemical Restraint: Prioritizing Patient Experience.Ryan Dougherty, Joanna Smolenski & Jared N. Smith - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (1):29-31.
On the Relative Intrusiveness of Physical and Chemical Restraints.Gabriel De Marco, Thomas Douglas, Lisa Forsberg & Julian Savulescu - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (1):26-28.
On Being Conscious as a Basic Liberty.Peter Shiu-Hwa Tsu & Shunsuke Sugimoto - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (1):24-26.
The Limitations of Principlism.Jed P. Mangal & Nathan S. Scheiner - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (1):17-19.
Preferences of Individual Mental Health Service Users Are Essential in Determining the Least Restrictive Type of Restraint.Christin Hempeler, Esther Braun, Mirjam Faissner, Jakov Gather & Matthé Scholten - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (1):19-22.
Basic Liberties, Consent, and Chemical Restraints.Parker Crutchfield & Michael Redinger - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (2).
The Conditions for Ethical Chemical Restraints.Parker Crutchfield & Michael Redinger - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (1):3-16.
“Ceteris Paribus” and Morally Relevant Facts.Jan Schildmann, Florian Bruns & Alexander Kremling - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):66-67.
Economic Liberty, Price Control, and Environmental Harm.Rafael Martins - 2018 - Justiça Eleitoral Em Debate 8 (2):83-90.
The Conditions For Ethical Application of Restraints.Parker Crutchfield, Tyler Gibb, Michael Redinger, Dan Ferman & John Livingstone - 2018 - Chest 155 (3):617-625.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-01-13

Downloads
9 (#1,268,194)

6 months
9 (#437,668)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Birks
University of Hong Kong

Citations of this work

Basic Liberties, Consent, and Chemical Restraints.Parker Crutchfield & Michael Redinger - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (2).

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Morality of Freedom.Joseph Raz - 1986 - Philosophy 63 (243):119-122.
The Conditions for Ethical Chemical Restraints.Parker Crutchfield & Michael Redinger - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (1):3-16.
Rational Persuasion as Paternalism.George Tsai - 2014 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 42 (1):78-112.
Punishing Intentions and Neurointerventions.David Birks & Alena Buyx - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):133-143.
Introduction.Thomas Douglas & David Birks - 2018 - In David Birks & Thomas Douglas (eds.), Treatment for Crime: Philosophical Essays on Neurointerventions in Criminal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

View all 7 references / Add more references