Results for 'stimulus-response generalization'

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  25
    Stimulus-response generalization with discrete response choices.Gustav Levine - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 60 (1):23.
  2.  53
    Stimulus and response generalization: Tests of a model relating generalization to distance in psychological space.Roger N. Shepard - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (6):509.
  3.  13
    Studies of response generalization in conditioning. I. Stimulus generalization during response generalization.D. D. Wickens - 1943 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 33 (3):221.
  4.  20
    Isolation effects: Stimulus and response generalization as explanatory concepts.Slater E. Newman & Eli Saltz - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (5):467.
  5.  18
    Stimulus and response generalization: Deduction of the generalization gradient from a trace model.Roger N. Shepard - 1958 - Psychological Review 65 (4):242-256.
  6.  25
    Stimulus identity as related to response specificity and response generalization.Delos D. Wickens - 1948 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 38 (4):389.
  7. Associations to stimulus-response theories of language.Thomas G. Bever - 1968 - In T. Dixon & Deryck Horton (eds.), Verbal Behavior and General Behavior Theory. Prentice-Hall. pp. 478--494.
  8.  25
    Stimulus generalization of the conditioned eyelid response to structurally similar nonsense syllables.David W. Abbott & Louis E. Price - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (4):368.
  9.  13
    Generalization of reinforcement among similar responses made in altered stimulus situations.Melvin H. Marx & Benjamin B. Bernstein - 1955 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 50 (6):355.
  10.  19
    Multidimensional stimulus generalization of a tactile response along the dimensions of angularity and texture.Ronald B. Purtle & Frederick L. Newman - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (3):566.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  15
    Conditioned generalization of the galvanic skin response to a subvocal stimulus.Clyde E. Noble - 1950 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (1):15.
  12.  22
    Stimulus generalization as a function of testing procedure and response measure.Richard H. Hiss & David R. Thomas - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (6):587.
  13.  26
    Stimulus categorizing in the generalization of a voluntary response.Eric Aronson & Albert Erlebacher - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (4p1):585.
  14.  18
    Stimulus generalization of an instrumental response as a function of the number of reinforced trials.Garry Margolius - 1955 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 49 (2):105.
  15.  24
    Stimulus generalization as a function of drive level, and the relation between two measures of response strength.J. Robert Newman & G. Robert Grice - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (4):357.
  16.  10
    Formulation of a generalization surface for the simultaneous variation of stimulus and response similarity.Michael Shea - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (2p1):353.
  17.  25
    Attention and cue-producing responses in response-mediated stimulus generalization.Thomas E. Malloy & Henry C. Ellis - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 83 (2p1):191.
  18.  41
    A response to "stimulus meaning".Paul Ziff - 1970 - Philosophical Review 79 (1):63-74.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  19.  37
    Stimulus generalization in the learning of classifications.Roger N. Shepard & Jih-Jie Chang - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (1):94.
  20.  39
    Stimulus generalization as a function of the serial position of the stimulus during prior training.Marvin E. Shaw & F. A. King - 1956 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 52 (4):228.
  21.  27
    Stimulus generalization and aggressive verbal stimuli.Arnold H. Buss - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (6):469.
  22.  13
    Stimulus generalization as a function of level of motivation.David R. Thomas & Richard A. King - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 (5):323.
  23.  19
    Stimulus generalization after equal training on two stimuli.Harry I. Kalish & Norman Guttman - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 (2):139.
  24.  16
    Primary stimulus generalization under different percentages of reinforcement in eyelid conditioning.William E. Vandament & Louis Price - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (2):162.
  25.  28
    Transfer from classical conditioning and extinction to acquisition, extinction, and stimulus generalization of a positively reinforced instrumental response.Milton A. Trapold & Stephen Winokur - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 73 (4p1):517.
  26.  18
    The relation between conditioned stimulus intensity and response strength.Charles C. Perkins Jr - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 46 (4):225.
  27.  25
    Effect of stimulus condition and reaction time information on spatial stimulus generalization.Charles Y. Nakamura & Jaques W. Kaswan - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (1):67.
  28. The reward and punishment responsivity and motivation questionnaire (RPRM-Q): A stimulus-independent self-report measure of reward and punishment sensitivity that differentiates between responsivity and motivation.Nienke C. Jonker, Marieke E. Timmerman & Peter J. de Jong - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
    Reward and punishment sensitivity seem important traits in understanding behavior in general and psychopathology in particular. Though the definitions used for reward and punishment sensitivity differentiate between responsivity and motivation, the measures thus far used to assess these constructs do not. Further, specificity of the type of reward and punishment in questionnaires might result in measurement bias especially when examining the relationship with psychopathology. Therefore, we developed a stimulus-independent multidimensional questionnaire of reward and punishment sensitivity that differentiates between responsivity (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29.  11
    Primary and secondary stimulus generalization as related to intelligence level.Irv Bialer - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (4):395.
  30.  13
    Differential conditioning along two dimensions and stimulus generalization of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response.John W. Moore & Frederick W. Mis - 1973 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1 (2):123-125.
  31.  10
    The effect of increasing the response rate in S1 and S2 on stimulus generalization and the peak shift.Joseph E. Lyons, William D. Klipec & Candy Siegel - 1974 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 4 (4):421-423.
  32.  30
    Determinism and behaviorist epistemology: A conditioned response to a Hinman stimulus.Bruce N. Waller - 1982 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 20 (4):513-532.
  33.  16
    Generalization of a muscle action potential response to tonal duration.John B. Fink & R. C. Davis - 1951 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 42 (6):403.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34.  13
    Generalization of an instrumental response with variation in two attributes of the CS.Sheldon H. White - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (4):339.
  35.  22
    Relationship between generalization and discrimination: Training and the definition of response.Donald A. Schumsky - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (5):470.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36.  24
    The generalization of conditioned responses. IV. The effects of varying amounts of reinforcement upon the degree of generalization of conditioned responses. [REVIEW]C. I. Hovland - 1937 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 21 (3):261.
  37.  18
    Supplementary report: Spatial generalization of voluntary responses under two techniques of study and two levels of anxiety.Bryan D. Dixon & Delos D. Wickens - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (6):508.
  38.  27
    Supplementary report: Generalization of a nonverbal response to aggressive verbal stimuli.James H. Geer & Arnold H. Buss - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 (4):413.
  39.  29
    The generalization of conditioned responses. III. Extinction, spontaneous recovery, and disinhibition of conditioned and of generalized responses. [REVIEW]C. I. Hovland - 1937 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 21 (1):47.
  40.  48
    Stimulus-category competition, inhibition, and affective devaluation: a novel account of the uncanny valley.Anne E. Ferrey, Tyler J. Burleigh & Mark J. Fenske - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6:92507.
    Stimuli that resemble humans, but are not perfectly human-like, are disliked compared to distinctly human and nonhuman stimuli. Accounts of this “Uncanny Valley” effect often focus on how changes in human resemblance can evoke different emotional responses. We present an alternate account based on the novel hypothesis that the Uncanny Valley is not directly related to ‘human-likeness’ per se, but instead reflects a more general form of stimulus devaluation that occurs when inhibition is triggered to resolve conflict between competing (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  41.  21
    Formation, maintenance, generalization, and retention of response hierarchies.Albert E. Goss & Nancy J. Cobb - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (2):218.
  42.  7
    Stimulus itensity and the asymmetrical matching principle.Sandra Harris & E. Neil Murray - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (2):257.
  43.  27
    On the Generalization of Habituation: How Discrete Biological Systems Respond to Repetitive Stimuli.Mattia Bonzanni, Nicolas Rouleau, Michael Levin & David Lee Kaplan - 2019 - Bioessays 41 (7):1900028.
    Habituation, a form of non‐associative learning, isno longer studied exclusively within the fields of psychology and neuroscience. Indeed, the same stimulusresponse pattern is observed at the molecular, cellular, and organismal scales and is not dependent upon the presence of neurons. Hence, a more inclusive theory is required to accommodate aneural forms of habituation. Here an abstraction of the habituation process that does not rely upon particular biological pathways or substrates is presented. Instead, five generalizable elements that define the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  44.  33
    Context and frequency effects in the generalization of a human voluntary response.John A. Hebert, Marsha Bullock, Lynn Levitt, Kim Groves Woodward & Frank D. McGuirk - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (3):456.
  45.  5
    The Influence of the Stimulus Design on the Harmonic Components of the Steady-State Visual Evoked Potential.Benjamin Solf, Stefan Schramm, Maren-Christina Blum & Sascha Klee - 2020 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 14.
    Steady-state visual evoked potentials are commonly used for functional objective diagnostics. In general, the main response at the stimulation frequency is used. However, some studies reported the main response at the second harmonic of the stimulation frequency. The aim of our study was to analyze the influence of the stimulus design on the harmonic components of ssVEPs. We studied 22 subjects using a circular layout. At a given eccentricity, the stimulus was presented according to a 7.5 (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  10
    Response strength as a function of changed intertrial interval.Claire B. Ernhart - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 60 (4):208.
  47.  26
    Consumer Response to Unethical Corporate Behavior: A Re-Examination and Extension of the Moral Decoupling Model.Kristina Haberstroh, Ulrich R. Orth, Stefan Hoffmann & Berit Brunk - 2017 - Journal of Business Ethics 140 (1):161-173.
    This research replicates Bhattacharjee et al. :1167–1184, 2013) moral decoupling model and extends the original along the dimensions of theory, method, and context. Adopting a branding perspective and focusing on the corporate domain rather than the public figures investigated by Bhattacharjee and colleagues, this research examines the proposition that consumers dissociate judgments of morality from judgments of performance to justify purchasing from companies deemed to act immorally. The original study is further extended by applying the model in a different cultural (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  48.  15
    Dependence of equality judgments upon the temporal interval between stimulus presentations.Wallace R. McAllister, Dorothy E. McAllister & Joseph J. Franchina - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 70 (6):602.
  49.  14
    The generalization gradient in recognition memory.Leo Postman - 1951 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 42 (4):231.
  50.  15
    Sensory generalization with voluntary reactions.E. J. Gibson - 1939 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 24 (3):237.
1 — 50 / 1000